Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 3;9(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s40170-021-00261-w.

The effect of metabolic syndrome on head and neck cancer incidence risk: a population-based prospective cohort study

Affiliations

The effect of metabolic syndrome on head and neck cancer incidence risk: a population-based prospective cohort study

Huaili Jiang et al. Cancer Metab. .

Abstract

Background: There are limited evidences clarifying the impact of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components on head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence risk. We explored the correlation between MS, MS components, and the combined effects of MS and C-reactive protein (CRP) and HNC risk.

Methods: This is a prospective analysis of 474,929 participants from the UK Biobank cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression was utilized to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and to explore the non-linear correlation between an individual MS component and HNC risk.

Results: Individuals with MS (HR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.90-1.22) had no higher HNC risk than those without MS. More MS components showed no higher HNC risk. Nevertheless, hyperglycemia (HR, 1.22; 95%CI, 1.02-1.45) was independently correlated with elevated HNC risk. In a non-linear manner, waist circumference and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) showed a U-shaped association with HNC risk. Further, piecewise linear model analysis indicated that higher male waist circumference, female waist circumference (≥93.16 cm), blood glucose (≥4.70 mmol/L) and male HDL-C (≥1.26mmo/L), and lower male HDL-C (<1.26mmo/L) were correlated with higher HNC risk. Increased CRP (≥1.00mg/dL) elevated HNC risk and individuals with MS and CRP≥1.00mg/dL had the highest HNC risk (HR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.05-1.58). But no joint effect between MS and CRP was detected (p-interaction=0.501).

Conclusions: MS are not correlated with elevated HNC risk. High waist circumference and blood glucose are independent risk factor of HNC incidence. Controlling HDL-C in an appropriate range can get the lowest risk of male HNC. No joint effect of MS and CRP exists in HNC tumorigenesis.

Keywords: C-reactive protein; Head and neck cancer; Metabolic syndrome; Metabolic syndrome components.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The non-linear effect between individual MS components and HNC risk. A Waist circumference, B waist circumference for males, C waist circumference for females, D HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol), E HDL-C for males, F HDL-C for females, G blood glucose, H SBP (systolic blood pressure), I DBP (diastolic blood pressure), J TG (triglyceride)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reuter CW, Morgan MA, Eckardt A. Targeting EGF-receptor-signalling in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(3):408–416. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603566. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo W, Song H. Development of gene therapeutics for head and neck cancer in china: from bench to bedside. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29(2):180–187. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.230. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang H, Kiess A, Chung CH. Emerging biomarkers in head and neck cancer in the era of genomics. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12(1):11–26. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(3):386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017. - DOI - PubMed