Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience
- PMID: 34083029
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.028
Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience
Abstract
Objective: To compare long-term oncological outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer (CC) patients treated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), with a focus on recurrence patterns, tumor sizes, and conization.
Methods: This single-institution, retrospective study consisted of stage IA1-IB1 (FIGO 2009) squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix, who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2000 and 2017.
Results: Of the 582 patients included, 353 (60.7%) underwent ARH, and 229 (39.3%) MIRH. The median follow-up was 14.4 years in the ARH group and 6.1 years in the MIRH group (p < 0.0001). Among the 96 stage IA patients, only 3 (3.1%) experienced recurrence. Among stage IB1 patients, the risk of recurrence, after adjusting for standard prognostic variables, was twofold higher in the MIRH group versus the ARH group (HR 2.73, 95% CI: 1.56-4.80), and the relative difference was similar in terms of risk of cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 3.04, 95% CI: 1.28-7.20) and overall survival (OS) (HR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.21-4.59). In stage IB1 ≤ 2 cm patients without conization MIRH was associated with reduced time to recurrence (TTR) (HR 4.00, 95% CI: 1.67-9.57), CSS (HR 3.71, 95% CI: 1.19-11.58) and OS (HR 3.02, 95% CI: 1.24-7.34). Intraperitoneal combined recurrences accounted for 12 of 30 (40.0%) recurrences in the MIRH group but were not identified after ARH (p = 0.0001).
Conclusions: MIRH was associated with reduced TTR, CSS and OS versus ARH in stage IB1 CC patients. The risk of peritoneal recurrence was high, even for tumors ≤2 cm without conization.
Keywords: Abdominal radical hysterectomy; Cervical cancer; Early stage; Minimally invasive surgery; Oncologic outcomes; Radical hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.508. Epub 2020 Jul 12. Gynecol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32665147
-
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 25;101(8):e28911. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028911. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. PMID: 35212297 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan;28(1):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 19. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32320800
-
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15. Eur J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32422504 Review.
-
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):544-555.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.023. Epub 2020 Dec 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33359291
Cited by
-
Interleukin-6 and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase as potential adjuvant targets for Papillomavirus-related tumors immunotherapy.Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 3;13:1005937. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1005937. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36405719 Free PMC article.
-
Editorial: Early cervical cancer: laparotomic vs minimally invasive surgery and fertility-sparing possible strategies.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 3;11:1415558. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1415558. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38765252 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;11:762921. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762921. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35141141 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study.Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 6;30(2):1977-1985. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020153. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36826114 Free PMC article.
-
Does Vaginal Cuff Creation and Avoidance of a Uterine Manipulator Improve the Prognosis of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 9;14(18):4389. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184389. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36139549 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous