Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan-Jun:787:108371.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108371. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

The hCOMET project: International database comparison of results with the comet assay in human biomonitoring. Baseline frequency of DNA damage and effect of main confounders

Mirta Milić  1 Marcello Ceppi  2 Marco Bruzzone  2 Amaya Azqueta  3 Gunnar Brunborg  4 Roger Godschalk  5 Gudrun Koppen  6 Sabine Langie  5 Peter Møller  7 João Paulo Teixeira  8 Avdulla Alija  9 Diana Anderson  10 Vanessa Andrade  11 Cristina Andreoli  12 Fisnik Asllani  9 Ezgi Eyluel Bangkoglu  13 Magdalena Barančoková  14 Nursen Basaran  15 Elisa Boutet-Robinet  16 Annamaria Buschini  17 Delia Cavallo  18 Cristiana Costa Pereira  8 Carla Costa  8 Solange Costa  8 Juliana Da Silva  19 Cristian Del Boˊ  20 Vesna Dimitrijević Srećković  21 Ninoslav Djelić  22 Malgorzata Dobrzyńska  23 Zdenka Duračková  24 Monika Dvořáková  24 Goran Gajski  1 Serena Galati  25 Omar García Lima  26 Lisa Giovannelli  27 Irina A Goroshinskaya  28 Annemarie Grindel  29 Kristine B Gutzkow  4 Alba Hernández  30 Carlos Hernández  31 Kirsten B Holven  32 Idoia Ibero-Baraibar  33 Inger Ottestad  32 Ela Kadioglu  34 Alena Kažimirová  14 Elena Kuznetsova  35 Carina Ladeira  36 Blanca Laffon  37 Palma Lamonaca  38 Pierre Lebailly  39 Henriqueta Louro  40 Tania Mandina Cardoso  26 Francesca Marcon  12 Ricard Marcos  30 Massimo Moretti  41 Silvia Moretti  42 Mojgan Najafzadeh  10 Zsuzsanna Nemeth  43 Monica Neri  38 Bozena Novotna  44 Irene Orlow  45 Zuzana Paduchova  24 Susana Pastor  30 Hervé Perdry  46 Biljana Spremo-Potparević  47 Dwi Ramadhani  48 Patrizia Riso  20 Paula Rohr  11 Emilio Rojas  49 Pavel Rossner  44 Anna Safar  43 Semra Sardas  50 Maria João Silva  40 Nikolay Sirota  35 Bozena Smolkova  51 Marta Staruchova  14 Rudolf Stetina  52 Helga Stopper  13 Ekaterina I Surikova  28 Stine M Ulven  32 Cinzia Lucia Ursini  18 Vanessa Valdiglesias  53 Mahara Valverde  49 Pavel Vodicka  54 Katarina Volkovova  14 Karl-Heinz Wagner  29 Lada Živković  47 Maria Dušinská  55 Andrew R Collins  32 Stefano Bonassi  56
Affiliations
Review

The hCOMET project: International database comparison of results with the comet assay in human biomonitoring. Baseline frequency of DNA damage and effect of main confounders

Mirta Milić et al. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2021 Jan-Jun.

Abstract

The alkaline comet assay, or single cell gel electrophoresis, is one of the most popular methods for assessing DNA damage in human population. One of the open issues concerning this assay is the identification of those factors that can explain the large inter-individual and inter-laboratory variation. International collaborative initiatives such as the hCOMET project - a COST Action launched in 2016 - represent a valuable tool to meet this challenge. The aims of hCOMET were to establish reference values for the level of DNA damage in humans, to investigate the effect of host factors, lifestyle and exposure to genotoxic agents, and to compare different sources of assay variability. A database of 19,320 subjects was generated, pooling data from 105 studies run by 44 laboratories in 26 countries between 1999 and 2019. A mixed random effect log-linear model, in parallel with a classic meta-analysis, was applied to take into account the extensive heterogeneity of data, due to descriptor, specimen and protocol variability. As a result of this analysis interquartile intervals of DNA strand breaks (which includes alkali-labile sites) were reported for tail intensity, tail length, and tail moment (comet assay descriptors). A small variation by age was reported in some datasets, suggesting higher DNA damage in oldest age-classes, while no effect could be shown for sex or smoking habit, although the lack of data on heavy smokers has still to be considered. Finally, highly significant differences in DNA damage were found for most exposures investigated in specific studies. In conclusion, these data, which confirm that DNA damage measured by the comet assay is an excellent biomarker of exposure in several conditions, may contribute to improving the quality of study design and to the standardization of results of the comet assay in human populations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02231736.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Comet assay; DNA damage; Human biomonitoring; Pooled analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Geographical distribution of the 26 countries contributing data to the hCOMET dataset (dark grey).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Frequency (median and interquartile distance) of DNA damage measured in the whole dataset for all endpoints. 1a) Tail length; 1b) Tail intensity; 1c) Tail moment; 1d) Visual Scoring. Reference lines corresponds to the overall median values for the specific endpoint. Overall median and interquartile interval is reported with whole and dotted lines, respectively in Figure 1a, 1b, and 1c. All statistics shown in this table refers to unexposed cases only.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Estimated variation of Tail intensity by sex. Mean ratios (MR), i.e., the ratio of mean DNA values of males to the mean values of females, with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) are reported for individual studies and for the whole dataset.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Estimated variation of Tail intensity for study groups as compared to unexposed controls. Estimates for individual study and for the whole dataset. Mean ratios (MR), i.e., the ratio of mean DNA values of subjects exposed to the mean values of unexposed controls, with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) are reported for individual studies and for the whole dataset.

References

    1. Collins AR, The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations, Mol. Biotechnol 26 (2004) 249–261 - PubMed
    1. Azqueta A, Collins AR, The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair, Arch. Toxicol 87 (2013) 949–968. - PubMed
    1. Møller P, The comet assay: ready for 30 more years, Mutagenesis 33 (2018) 1–7. - PubMed
    1. Neri M, Milazzo D, Ugolini D, Milic M, Campolongo A, Pasqualetti P, Bonassi S, Worldwide interest in the comet assay: a bibliometric study, Mutagenesis 30 (2015) 155–163. - PubMed
    1. Azqueta A, Ladeira C, Giovannelli L, Boutet-Robinet E, Bonassi S, Neri M, Gajskii G, Duthie S, Del Bo C, Riso P, Koppen G, Basaran N, Collins A, Møller P, Application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring:an hCOMET, Mutat. Res 783 (2020) 82–88. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data