Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan-Jun:787:108364.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108364. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

A review of the genotoxicity of the industrial chemical cumene

Affiliations
Free article
Review

A review of the genotoxicity of the industrial chemical cumene

B Bhaskar Gollapudi et al. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2021 Jan-Jun.
Free article

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature on the genotoxicity of cumene (CAS # 98-82-8) and to assess the role of mutagenicity, if any, in the mode of action for cumene-induced rodent tumors. The studies reviewed included microbial mutagenicity, DNA damage/ repair, cytogenetic effects, and gene mutations. In reviewing these studies, attention was paid to their conformance to applicable OECD test guidelines which are considered as internationally recognized standards for performing these assays. Cumene was not a bacterial mutagen and did not induce Hprt mutations in CHO cell cultures. In the primary rat hepatocyte cultures, cumene induced unscheduled DNA synthesis in one study but this response could not be reproduced in an independent study using a similar protocol. In a study that is not fully compliant to the current OECD guideline, no increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in CHO cells treated with cumene. The weight of the evidence (WoE) from multiple in vivo studies indicates that cumene is not a clastogen or aneugen. The weak positive response in an in vivo comet assay in the rat liver and mouse lung tissues is of questionable significance due to several study deficiencies. The genotoxicity profile of cumene does not match that of a classic DNA-reactive molecule and the available data does not support a conclusion that cumene is an in vivo mutagen. As such, mutagenicity does not appear to be an early key event in cumene-induced rodent tumors and alternate hypothesized non-mutagenic modes-of-action are presented. Further data are necessary to rule in or rule out a particular MoA.

Keywords: Aneugenicity; Clastogenicity; DNA damage; Genotoxicity; Micronucleus; Mutation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Financial support for this review was provided by the Chemical Products & Technology Division of the American Chemistry Council, 700 2(nd) Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20002. The opinions and conclusions presented in the review are those of the authors and are not those of the authors’ employer or the sponsor.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources