Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;38(9):663-672.
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210450. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review of the academic literature

Affiliations

Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review of the academic literature

Daniel Darbyshire et al. Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Workforce issues prevail across healthcare; in emergency medicine (EM), previous work improved retention, but the staffing problem changed rather than improved. More experienced doctors provide higher quality and more cost-effective care, and turnover of these physicians is expensive. Research focusing on staff retention is an urgent priority.

Methods: This study is a scoping review of the academic literature relating to the retention of doctors in EM and describes current evidence about sustainable careers (focusing on factors influencing retention), as well as interventions to improve retention. The established and rigorous JBI scoping review methodology was followed. The data sources searched were MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, HMIC and PsycINFO, with papers published up to April 2020 included. Broad eligibility criteria were used to identify papers about retention or related terms, including turnover, sustainability, exodus, intention to quit and attrition, whose population included emergency physicians within the setting of the ED. Papers which solely measured the rate of one of these concepts were excluded.

Results: Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria. Multiple factors were identified as linked with retention, including perceptions about teamwork, excessive workloads, working conditions, errors, teaching and education, portfolio careers, physical and emotional strain, stress, burnout, debt, income, work-life balance and antisocial working patterns. Definitions of key terms were used inconsistently. No factors clearly dominated; studies of correlation between factors were common. There were minimal research reporting interventions.

Conclusion: Many factors have been linked to retention of doctors in EM, but the research lacks an appreciation of the complexity inherent in career decision-making. A broad approach, addressing multiple factors rather than focusing on single factors, may prove more informative.

Keywords: HR management; emergency care systems; emergency department; emergency departments; management; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inclusion and exclusion criteria. *Type 1 EDs are ‘consultant led 24 hour service with full resuscitation facilities and designated accommodation for the reception of accident and emergency patients’.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Review findings mapped to the ABC of doctors' core needs.

Comment in

References

    1. Hughes G. The emergency medicine taskforce: an interim report. Emerg Med J 2013;30:348. 10.1136/emermed-2012-202260 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith E, RCEM Service Design and Configuration Committee . Consultant staffing in emergency departments in the UK. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine; 2018. https://www.rcem.ac.uk/docs/Workforce/RCEM_Consultant_Workforce_Document... [Accessed 6 Feb 2019].
    1. Health Education England . Specialty recruitment: round 1 - acceptance and fill rate. Health Education England, 2018. Available: https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/medical-recruitment/specialty-recruitmen... [Accessed 9 Aug 2019].
    1. Crouch R, Brown R. Advanced clinical practitioners in emergency care: past, present and future. Br J Hosp Med 2018;79:511–5. 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.9.511 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Navari M. Final progression survey data 2018-2019 for RCEM Council. London, UK: Royal College of Emergency Medicine, 2020.

Publication types