Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11727.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90856-6.

Insulin micro-secretion in Type 1 diabetes and related microRNA profiles

Affiliations

Insulin micro-secretion in Type 1 diabetes and related microRNA profiles

Andrzej S Januszewski et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare plasma C-peptide presence and levels in people without diabetes (CON) and with Type 1 diabetes and relate C-peptide status to clinical factors. In a subset we evaluated 50 microRNAs (miRs) previously implicated in beta-cell death and associations with clinical status and C-peptide levels. Diabetes age of onset was stratified as adult (≥ 18 y.o) or childhood (< 18 y.o.), and diabetes duration was stratified as ≤ 10 years, 10-20 years and > 20 years. Plasma C-peptide was measured by ultrasensitive ELISA. Plasma miRs were quantified using TaqMan probe-primer mix on an OpenArray platform. C-peptide was detectable in 55.3% of (n = 349) people with diabetes, including 64.1% of adults and 34.0% of youth with diabetes, p < 0.0001 and in all (n = 253) participants without diabetes (CON). C-peptide levels, when detectable, were lower in the individuals with diabetes than in the CON group [median lower quartile (LQ)-upper quartile (UQ)] 5.0 (2.6-28.7) versus 650.9 (401.2-732.4) pmol/L respectively, p < 0.0001 and lower in childhood versus adult-onset diabetes [median (LQ-UQ) 4.2 (2.6-12.2) pmol/L vs. 8.0 (2.3-80.5) pmol/L, p = 0.02, respectively]. In the childhood-onset group more people with longer diabetes duration (> 20 years) had detectable C-peptide (60%) than in those with shorter diabetes duration (39%, p for trend < 0.05). Nine miRs significantly correlated with detectable C-peptide levels in people with diabetes and 16 miRs correlated with C-peptide levels in CON. Our cross-sectional study results are supportive of (a) greater beta-cell function loss in younger onset Type 1 diabetes; (b) persistent insulin secretion in adult-onset diabetes and possibly regenerative secretion in childhood-onset long diabetes duration; and (c) relationships of C-peptide levels with circulating miRs. Confirmatory clinical studies and related basic science studies are merited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AAH, MVJ and ASJ are inventors on a patent application (WO2019000015A1, which is also published/available as AU2018293544 EP3645737, US20200172975) related to the miRNAs discussed in this work. YHC, RF, ES, WKMW, LMC, YWL, PZBA, ACK, DNO, MEC, KCD and AJJ declare no financial or non-financial competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Segmental linear regression of detectable C-peptide levels versus Type 1 diabetes duration. Overall r = 0.45, slope before threshold p = 0.0005, slope after threshold p = 0.66; diabetes duration threshold 8.8 (95% CI 5.7, 11.9) years (p < 0.0001). (B) Comparison of proportion of detectable C-peptide in participants with diabetes stratified by age of diabetes diagnosis and duration. Significant positive trend in percentage of detectable C-peptide with diabetes duration in diabetes diagnosed below 18 y.o. (p = 0.01) and borderline negative trend in diabetes diagnosed ≥ 18 y.o. (p = 0.07).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venn diagram of miRs showing significant expression (Ct) differences in participants with diabetes with versus without detectable C-peptide, participants with and without diabetes with C-peptide levels below and above median. Arrows indicating the miRs abundance difference in comparison to the reference group (formula image: compared with undetectable for C-peptide status, formula imageand formula image: compared with below median C-peptide levels in participants with and without diabetes respectively).

References

    1. Klinke DJ. Extent of beta cell destruction is important but insufficient to predict the onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001374. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keenan HA, et al. Residual insulin production and pancreatic ss-cell turnover after 50 years of diabetes: Joslin Medalist Study. Diabetes. 2010;59:2846–2853. doi: 10.2337/db10-0676. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madsbad S, et al. Prevalence of residual beta-cell function in insulin-dependent diabetics in relation to age at onset and duration of diabetes. Diabetes. 1978;27(Suppl 1):262–264. doi: 10.2337/diab.27.1.S262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Effects of age, duration and treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on residual beta-cell function: observations during eligibility testing for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The DCCT Research Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab65, 30–36, (1987). - PubMed
    1. Sorensen JS, et al. Residual beta-Cell function 3–6 years after onset of type 1 diabetes reduces risk of severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3454–3459. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0418. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms