Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11729.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88719-1.

Risk factors for rapid axial length elongation with low concentration atropine for myopia control

Affiliations

Risk factors for rapid axial length elongation with low concentration atropine for myopia control

Aicun Fu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Three hundred and twenty-eight myopic children, randomized to use either 0.01% (N = 166) or 0.02% (N = 162) atropine were enrolled in this study. Gender, age, body mass index(BMI), parental myopia status, atropine concentration used, pupil diameter, amplitude of accommodation, spherical equivalent refractive error (SER), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) were collected at baseline and 1 year after using atropine. Rapid AL elongation was defined as > 0.36 mm growth per year. Univariate analyses showed that children with rapid AL elongation tend to be younger, have a smaller BMI, use of 0.01% atropine, narrow ACD, lower SER, shorter AL, smaller change in pupil diameter between 1 year and baseline (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that rapid AL elongation was associated with children that were younger at baseline (P < 0.0001), use of 0.01% atropine (P = 0.04), a shorter baseline AL (P = 0.03) and a smaller change in pupil diameter between 1 year and baseline (P = 0.04). Younger children with shorter AL at baseline, less change in their pupil diameter with atropine treatment and using the lower of the two atropine concentrations may undergo rapid AL elongation over a 12 months myopia control treatment period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subject recruitment and randomization flowchart.

References

    1. Lim MCC, Gazzard G, Sim EL, Tong L, Saw SM. Direct costs of myopia in singapore. Eye. 2009;23:1086–1089. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.225. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holden BA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmol. 2016;123:1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith TST, et al. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Org. 2009;87:431–473. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.055673. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, et al. Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: An evidence-based systematic review. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;157:9–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chia A, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: changes after stopping atropine 0.01%, 0.1% and 0.5% Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;157:451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.020. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types