Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;50(5):104226.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104226.

The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science

Affiliations

The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science

E Richard Gold. Res Policy. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

There is growing concern that the innovation system's ability to create wealth and attain social benefit is declining in effectiveness. This article explores the reasons for this decline and suggests a structure, the open science partnership, as one mechanism through which to slow down or reverse this decline. The article examines the empirical literature of the last century to document the decline. This literature suggests that the cost of research and innovation is increasing exponentially, that researcher productivity is declining, and, third, that these two phenomena have led to an overall flat or declining level of innovation productivity. The article then turns to three explanations for the decline - the growing complexity of science, a mismatch of incentives, and a balkanization of knowledge. Finally, the article explores the role that open science partnerships - public-private partnerships based on open access publications, open data and materials, and the avoidance of restrictive forms of intellectual property - can play in increasing the efficiency of the innovation system.

Keywords: Innovation; Intellectual property; Networks; Open science; Patents; Public-private partnerships; Research incentives; Research productivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Medical research expenditures 1960–2006 in Billions of 2017 US Dollars. From Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2010 (129th Edition), Table 127, National Health Expenditures–Summary, and Projections.

References

    1. Abernathy William J., Clark Kim B. Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy. 1985;14:3–22.
    1. Akcigit, U., W.R. Kerr, and T. Nicholas. 2013. “The mechanics of endogenous innovation and growth: evidence from historical U.S. patents,” 42.
    1. Ali-Khan Sarah E., Jean Antoine, Gold E.Richard. Identifying the Challenges in Implementing Open Science. MNI Open Res. 2018;2(October):5. doi: 10.12688/mniopenres.12805.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali-Khan Sarah E., Jean Antoine, MacDonald Emily, Gold E.Richard. Defining success in open science. MNI Open Res. 2018;2(March):2. doi: 10.12688/mniopenres.12780.2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allard, G., J. Miner, and R. Robertson. 2018. “AUTM US licensing activity survey: 2018”.

LinkOut - more resources