Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N
- PMID: 34083907
- PMCID: PMC8095699
- DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_109_19
Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to compare the compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) Type IX and Cention N.
Materials and methods: Five samples each of GIC Type IX and Cention N were prepared for testing the shear bond strength, tensile strength, and microhardness. Cylinders of the samples measuring 1 cm diameter and 6 mm height were prepared for compressive strength and shear bond strength. For shear bond strength, these samples were embedded into acrylic blocks of dimensions 2 cm × 2 cm. Testing of shear bond strength and compressive strength was done by mounting the samples in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The samples for microhardness were 1 cm diameter and 5 mm height. The samples were mounted on Vickers microhardness testing machine to test the microhardness.
Results: The values for shear bond strength of Cention N were statistically highly significant (P < 0.01) as compared to GIC Type IX, whereas the compressive strength and microhardness values of Cention N were statistically significant (P < 0.5) as compared to GIC Type IX.
Conclusion: The results suggest significantly higher values for mechanical properties of Cention N as compared to GIC Type IX.
Keywords: Cention N; compressive strength; glass-ionomer cement Type IX; microhardness; restorative dentistry; shear bond strength.
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Zero DT, Zandona AF, Vail MM, Spolnik KJ. Dental caries and pulpal disease. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55:29–46. - PubMed
-
- Tinanoff N, Douglass JM. Clinical decision-making for caries management in primary teeth. J Dent Educ. 2001;65:1133–42. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35:E157–64. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2016;37:232–43.
-
- Scientific Documentation: Cention N Ivoclar Vivadent AG Research & Development Scientific Service. 2016 Oct
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources