Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 20;14(6):1504-1513.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab008. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Outcomes after kidney transplantation, let's focus on the patients' perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Outcomes after kidney transplantation, let's focus on the patients' perspectives

Yiman Wang et al. Clin Kidney J. .

Abstract

Graft function and patient survival are traditionally the most used parameters to assess the objective benefits of kidney transplantation. Monitoring graft function, along with therapeutic drug concentrations and transplant complications, comprises the essence of outpatient management in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, the patient's perspective is not always included in this process. Patients' perspectives on their health after kidney transplantation, albeit subjective, are increasingly acknowledged as valuable healthcare outcomes and should be considered in order to provide patient-centred healthcare. Such outcomes are known as patient-reported outcomes (PROs; e.g. health-related quality of life and symptom burden) and are captured using PRO measures (PROMs). So far, PROMs have not been routinely used in clinical care for KTRs. In this review we will introduce PROMs and their potential application and value in the field of kidney transplantation, describe commonly used PROMs in KTRs and discuss structural PROMs implementation into kidney transplantation care.

Keywords: health-related quality of life; kidney transplantation; medication side effects; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); symptom burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Road map of the POSITIVE study.

References

    1. Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Knoll G. et al. Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2093–2109 - PubMed
    1. Yoo KD, Kim CT, Kim MH. et al. Superior outcomes of kidney transplantation compared with dialysis: an optimal matched analysis of a national population-based cohort study between 2005 and 2008 in Korea. Medicine 2016; 95: e4352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaballo MA, Canney M, O’Kelly P. et al. A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation. Clin Kidney J 2018; 11: 389–393 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weldring T, Smith SMS.. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights 2013; 6: 61–81 - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Egdom LSE, Oemrawsingh A, Verweij LM. et al. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical breast cancer care: a systematic review. Value Health 2019; 22: 1197–1226 - PubMed