Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 4;7(23):eabd6034.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd6034. Print 2021 Jun.

Natural climate solutions for Canada

Affiliations

Natural climate solutions for Canada

C Ronnie Drever et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

Alongside the steep reductions needed in fossil fuel emissions, natural climate solutions (NCS) represent readily deployable options that can contribute to Canada's goals for emission reductions. We estimate the mitigation potential of 24 NCS related to the protection, management, and restoration of natural systems that can also deliver numerous co-benefits, such as enhanced soil productivity, clean air and water, and biodiversity conservation. NCS can provide up to 78.2 (41.0 to 115.1) Tg CO2e/year (95% CI) of mitigation annually in 2030 and 394.4 (173.2 to 612.4) Tg CO2e cumulatively between 2021 and 2030, with 34% available at ≤CAD 50/Mg CO2e. Avoided conversion of grassland, avoided peatland disturbance, cover crops, and improved forest management offer the largest mitigation opportunities. The mitigation identified here represents an important potential contribution to the Paris Agreement, such that NCS combined with existing mitigation plans could help Canada to meet or exceed its climate goals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Potential annual mitigation in 2030 from 24 NCS for Canada.
We indicate the mitigation potential at each price point, with lower-cost options in darker gray. Black lines indicate the 95% CI; the line with an arrow indicates where uncertainty extends beyond the graph pane (see table S2 for values). Co-benefits of each natural climate solution (table S1) are indicated by colored bars for air, biodiversity, soil, water, and social benefits. FWM wetland, freshwater mineral wetland.

References

    1. Girardin M. P., Guo X. J., De Jong R., Kinnard C., Bernier P., Raulier F., Unusual forest growth decline in boreal North America covaries with the retreat of Arctic sea ice. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 851–866 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Price D. T., Alfaro R. I., Brown K. J., Flannigan M. D., Fleming R. A., Hogg E. H., Girardin M. P., Lakusta T., Johnston M., McKenney D. W., Pedlar J. H., Stratton T., Sturrock R. N., Thompson I. D., Trofymow J. A., Venier L. A., Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada’s boreal forest ecosystems. Environ. Rev. 21, 322–365 (2013).
    1. Dumanski S., Pomeroy J. W., Westbrook C. J., Hydrological regime changes in a Canadian Prairie basin. Hydrol. Process. 29, 3893–3904 (2015).
    1. Pattison-Williams J. K., Pomeroy J. W., Badiou P., Gabor S., Wetlands, flood control and ecosystem services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A case study in Saskatchewan, Canada. Ecol. Econ. 147, 36–47 (2018).
    1. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators: Progress Towards Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Target (Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, 2020), p. 14.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources