Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
- PMID: 34088970
- PMCID: PMC8455321
- DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-00849-8
Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model
Erratum in
-
Correction: Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a decision analysis model.Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Dec;45(12):2689. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00931-1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34446846 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the most cost-effective weight management programmes (WMPs) for adults, in England with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), who are more at risk of obesity related diseases.
Methods: An economic evaluation of five different WMPs: 1) low intensity (WMP1); 2) very low calorie diets (VLCD) added to WMP1; 3) moderate intensity (WMP2); 4) high intensity (Look AHEAD); and 5) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, all compared to a baseline scenario representing no WMP. We also compare a VLCD added to WMP1 vs. WMP1 alone. A microsimulation decision analysis model was used to extrapolate the impact of changes in BMI, obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of WMPs and bariatric surgery, on long-term risks of obesity related disease, costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) measured as incremental cost per QALY gained over a 30-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of long-term weight regain assumptions on results.
Results: RYGB was the most costly intervention but also generated the lowest incidence of obesity related disease and hence the highest QALY gains. Base case ICERs for WMP1, a VLCD added to WMP1, WMP2, Look AHEAD, and RYGB compared to no WMP were £557, £6628, £1540, £23,725 and £10,126 per QALY gained respectively. Adding a VLCD to WMP1 generated an ICER of over £121,000 per QALY compared to WMP1 alone. Sensitivity analysis found that all ICERs were sensitive to the modelled base case, five year post intervention cessation, weight regain assumption.
Conclusions: RYGB surgery was the most effective and cost-effective use of scarce NHS funding resources. However, where fixed healthcare budgets or patient preferences exclude surgery as an option, a standard 12 week behavioural WMP (WMP1) was the next most cost-effective intervention.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
PA was an investigator on an investigator-initiated trial funded by Cambridge Weight Plan, and has done half a day’s consultancy for Weight Watchers. These activities led to payments to the University of Oxford for his time but no payments to him personally. All others: none declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Bariatric surgery, lifestyle interventions and orlistat for severe obesity: the REBALANCE mixed-methods systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(68):1-246. doi: 10.3310/hta22680. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 30511918 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity.Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2203-2214. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3100-0. Obes Surg. 2018. PMID: 29335933
-
Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Gastric Bypass in Patients With Severe Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148317. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48317. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35157054 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity in Belgium.J Med Econ. 2018 Apr;21(4):365-373. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1419958. Epub 2018 Jan 10. J Med Econ. 2018. PMID: 29271279
-
Bariatric Surgery for Adults With Class I Obesity and Difficult-to-Manage Type 2 Diabetes: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 5;23(8):1-151. eCollection 2023. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023. PMID: 38130940 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Contemporary Review of Smart Phone Applications in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: an Underdeveloped Support Service.Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1866-1875. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06566-7. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Obes Surg. 2023. PMID: 37067684 Review.
-
Surgery is associated with better long-term outcomes than pharmacological treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):9521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57724-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38664450 Free PMC article.
-
Patient autonomy and metabolic bariatric surgery: an empirical perspective.BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 3;26(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01177-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2025. PMID: 39894883 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery in North America: a retrospective analysis of 834,647 patients.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Jun;18(6):803-811. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Mar 19. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022. PMID: 35474010 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing economic investment required to scale up bariatric surgery capacity in England: a health economic modelling analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 31;14(7):e084356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084356. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39089720 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Health and Social Care Information Centre. Health Survey for England 2018: Overweight and obesity in adults and children. Health and Social Care Information Centre (NHS digital), 2018.HSCIC, London.
-
- Department of Health. Healthy Lives, Healthy People: A call to action on obesity in England. London: DOH; 2011.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials