Effect of Expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit to Americans Without Dependent Children on Psychological Distress
- PMID: 34089046
- PMCID: PMC9347026
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab164
Effect of Expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit to Americans Without Dependent Children on Psychological Distress
Abstract
Antipoverty policies have the potential to improve mental health. We conducted a randomized trial (Paycheck Plus Health Study Randomized Controlled Trial, New York, New York) to investigate whether a 4-fold increase in the Earned Income Tax Credit for low-income Americans without dependent children would reduce psychological distress relative to the current federal credit. Between 2013 and 2014, a total of 5,968 participants were recruited; 2,997 were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 2,971 were assigned to the control group. Survey data were collected 32 months postrandomization (n = 4,749). Eligibility for the program increased employment by 1.9 percentage points and after-bonus earnings by 6% ($635/year), on average, over the 3 years of the study. Treatment was associated with a marginally statistically significant decline in psychological distress, as measured by the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, relative to the control group (score change = -0.30 points, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.63, 0.03; P = 0.072). Women in the treated group experienced a half-point reduction in psychological distress (score change = -0.55 points, 95% CI: -0.97, -0.13; P = 0.032), and noncustodial parents had a 1.36-point reduction (95% CI: -2.24, -0.49; P = 0.011). Expansion of a large antipoverty program to individuals without dependent children reduced psychological distress for women and noncustodial parents-the groups that benefitted the most in terms of increased after-bonus earnings.
Keywords: Earned Income Tax Credit; psychological distress; randomized controlled trials; social experiments.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.
Figures



Comment in
-
Invited Commentary: Conducting and Emulating Trials to Study Effects of Social Interventions.Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 23;191(8):1453-1456. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac066. Am J Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35445692 Free PMC article.
-
Courtin and Muennig Respond to "Trials of Social Determinants".Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 23;191(8):1457-1458. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac065. Am J Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35445693 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Dohrenwend BS. Social status and stressful life events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1973;28(2):225–235. - PubMed
-
- Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1099–1104. - PubMed
-
- Moffitt R. The US safety net and work incentives: Is there a problem? What should be done? In: Strain M, ed. The US Labor Market: Questions and Challenges for Public Policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute; 2016:122–137.