Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;68(9):e29135.
doi: 10.1002/pbc.29135. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

A scoping review of transition interventions for young adults with sickle cell disease

Affiliations

A scoping review of transition interventions for young adults with sickle cell disease

Adrienne Viola et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Jan;69(1):e29414. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29414. Epub 2021 Oct 21. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022. PMID: 34842349 No abstract available.

Abstract

Standardized programming for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) transitioning from pediatric to adult-centered care does not currently exist, resulting in high rates of mortality and morbidity. This scoping review examines and evaluates the current literature on SCD transition programs and interventions. Eligible studies described an existing program for individuals with SCD aged 12-29 years preparing to transition. The Evidence Project risk-of-bias tool was used to assess article quality. We identified 30 eligible articles, of which, only two were randomized controlled trials. Many studies have incomplete reports of feasibility information, such as completion rates, patient characteristics, and attrition; all studies were limited to a single institution; and most studies were rated high for risk of bias. Progress has been made in designing and gathering initial evaluation data for SCD transition programs; however, there is a need for higher quality studies, consistent assessment, and better dissemination of programs.

Keywords: scoping review; sickle cell disease; transition; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kato GJ, Piel FB, Reid CD, et al. Sickle cell disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18010. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hassell KL. Population estimates of sickle cell disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4 Suppl):S512–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinn CT, Rogers ZR, McCavit TL, Buchanan GR. Improved survival of children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2010;115(17):3447–3452. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-233700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saulsberry AC, Porter JS, Hankins JS. A program of transition to adult care for sickle cell disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019;2019(1):496–504. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2019000054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeBaun MR, Telfair J. Transition and sickle cell disease. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):926–935. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3049. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types