Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jan;132(1):88-95.
doi: 10.1002/lary.29674. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

The Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Burden in Oral Cavity Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tsung-You Tsai  1 , Andrea Iandelli  1   2   3 , Filippo Marchi  2   3   4 , Yenlin Huang  5 , Shiao-Fwu Tai  1 , Shao-Yu Hung  4 , Huang-Kai Kao  4 , Kai-Ping Chang  1   6
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Burden in Oral Cavity Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tsung-You Tsai et al. Laryngoscope. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Lymph node burden has been proposed to estimate the cumulative adverse effect of nodal metastasis. In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of lymph node burden in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Study designs: Systemic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library as well as manual searches were performed until April 2020. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival were extracted and pooled.

Results: Eleven included studies were published between 2009 and 2019. The cumulative number of patients was 20,607 (range 35-14,554). Extranodal extension was adjusted or evaluated in all of the studies. The meta-analysis indicated that a higher lymph node burden was significantly related to worse overall survival (HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.12-3.25), worse disease-specific survival (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.85-5.33) and worse disease-free survival (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.62-3.26). The highest hazard ratio was observed when the cutoff value was 3 for overall survival, 3 for disease-specific survival, and 4 for disease-free survival. The hazard ratio showed an upward trend before the cutoff value of 3 but no significant incremental change when the cutoff exceeded 3.

Conclusions: In oral squamous cell carcinoma, lymph node burden is an independent prognosticator for survival outcomes. However, more prospective or high-quality studies are required to determine the optimal cutoff.

Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 132:88-95, 2022.

Keywords: Lymph node burden; OSCC; head and neck; metastasis; oral cavity; squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Lo W, Kao S, Chi L, Wong Y, Chang RC. Outcomes of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Taiwan after surgical therapy: factors affecting survival. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:751-758.
    1. Petersen PE. Strengthening the prevention of oral cancer: the WHO perspective. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:397-399.
    1. Liao CT, Huang SF, Chen IH, et al. Outcome analysis of patients with pN2 oral cavity cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1118-1126.
    1. Amin MBES, Greene F, Byrd DR, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed.: New York: Springer International Publishing: American Joint Commission on Cancer; 2017.
    1. Ebrahimi A, Gil Z, Amit M, et al. The prognosis of N2b and N2c lymph node disease in oral squamous cell carcinoma is determined by the number of metastatic lymph nodes rather than laterality: evidence to support a revision of the American joint committee on cancer staging system. Cancer 2014;120:1968-1974.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources