Comparison of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine-Based Intravenous and Sevoflurane-Based Inhalational Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy
- PMID: 34092852
- PMCID: PMC8159053
- DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_13_21
Comparison of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine-Based Intravenous and Sevoflurane-Based Inhalational Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy
Abstract
Background and aim: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) has proven advantage over inhalational anesthesia in terms of stable hemodynamic, eco-friendly, and good recovery profile, but apprehension regarding adequate depth of anesthesia and intraoperative recall is still pertaining. This study aims to compare propofol-dexmedetomidine-based TIVA with sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia in modified radical mastectomy in terms of depth of anesthesia, intraoperative recall, recovery profile, and hemodynamic status.
Settings and design: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted at a tertiary care center over a time frame of 1 year.
Methodology: In this randomized controlled study, 100 patients were randomly distributed into two groups: TIVA (Group T) and inhalational anesthesia (Group I). Group T patients received injection dexmedetomidine: 1 μg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by 0.7 μg.kg-1.h-1 and injection propofol: 25-100 μg.kg-1.min-1. Ventilation was maintained with oxygen-air gas flow. In Group I, patients were ventilated with nitrous oxide-oxygen (50:50) and sevoflurane. Rest of anesthesia for both the groups was same. Primary objective was to achieve adequate depth of anesthesia as monitored by intraoperative bispectral index value (BIS, 40-60). Hemodynamic variables, recovery profile, and amount of individual anesthetic agent consumed were recorded for comparison between two groups. For comparison of scale variables between two groups, independent sample t-test for significant difference between two sample means has been followed.
Results: Intraoperative BIS and hemodynamic variables were comparable (P > 0.05). Emergence time was 5.10 min in the TIVA group versus 8.38 min in the inhalational group (P = 0.00). Modified Aldrete score was comparable in two groups (P > 0.05). Cost of TIVA agents consumed per patient was 40% lesser than inhalational agents.
Conclusion: TIVA maintains adequate depth of anesthesia along with stable hemodynamic and good recovery profile, at low cost in an eco-friendly manner.
Keywords: Air environmental pollutants; greenhouse effect; inhalation anesthesia; intraoperative awareness; intravenous anesthesia; modified radical mastectomy.
Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Sulbaek Andersen MP, Sander SP, Nielsen OJ, Wagner DS, Sanford TJ, Jr, Wallington TJ. Inhalation anaesthetics and climate change. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:760–6. - PubMed
-
- Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) 2020. [Last accessed 2020 Apr 09]. Available from: https://www.bbraun.co.uk/en/products-and-therapies/pain-therapy/totalint... .
-
- Yoo S, Lee HB, Han W, Noh DY, Park SK, Kim WH, et al. Total intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia for breast cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:31–40. - PubMed
-
- Wong GT, Choi SW, Tran DH, Kulkarni H, Irwin MG. An international survey evaluating factors influencing the use of total intravenous anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018;46:332–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous