Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 19:15:682426.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.682426. eCollection 2021.

Cortical Contributions to Higher-Order Conditioning: A Review of Retrosplenial Cortex Function

Affiliations
Review

Cortical Contributions to Higher-Order Conditioning: A Review of Retrosplenial Cortex Function

Danielle I Fournier et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

In higher-order conditioning paradigms, such as sensory preconditioning or second-order conditioning, discrete (e.g., phasic) or contextual (e.g., static) stimuli can gain the ability to elicit learned responses despite never being directly paired with reinforcement. The purpose of this mini-review is to examine the neuroanatomical basis of high-order conditioning, by selectively reviewing research that has examined the role of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in sensory preconditioning and second-order conditioning. For both forms of higher-order conditioning, we first discuss the types of associations that may occur and then review findings from RSC lesion/inactivation experiments. These experiments demonstrate a role for the RSC in sensory preconditioning, suggesting that this cortical region might contribute to higher-order conditioning via the encoding of neutral stimulus-stimulus associations. In addition, we address knowledge gaps, avenues for future research, and consider the contribution of the RSC to higher-order conditioning in relation to related brain structures.

Keywords: associative learning; higher-order conditioning; retrosplenial cortex; second-order conditioning; sensory preconditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that this review was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic of higher-order conditioning procedures. The figure depicts typical experimental conditioning for sensory preconditioning (A) and second-order conditioning (B), which are contrasted with control conditions (not shown). Discrete stimuli can be presented either serially (top row) or simultaneously (middle row). Higher-order conditioning of contextual stimuli is presented in the bottom row. Contexts are operationally defined as the static background stimuli provided by conditioning apparatus, and typically differ with respect to visual, tactile and olfactory characteristics. In the figure, contexts are distinguished by color and background.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A simplified schematic depicting retrosplenial connections with cortical and subcortical regions. The connectomic diagram is centered around retrosplenial cortex and does not include the complex interactions between all regions. V1, primary visual cortex; V2, secondary visual cortex; A1, primary auditory cortex; A2, secondary auditory cortex.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brogden W. J. (1939). Sensory preconditioning. J. Exp. Psychol. 25 323–332.
    1. Bucci D. J., Robinson S. (2014). Toward a conceptualization of retrohippocampal contributions to learning and meory. Neurobiol. Learn. Memory 116 197–207. 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.05.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckner R. L., Snyder A. Z., Shannon B. J., LaRossa G., Sachs R., Fotenos A. F., et al. (2005). Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory. J. Neurosci. 25 7709–7717. 10.1523/jneurosci.2177-05.2005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corcoran K. A., Yamawaki N., Leaderbrand K., Radulovic J. (2018). Role of the retrosplenial cortex in processing stress-related context memories. Behav. Neurosci. 132 388–395. 10.1037/bne0000223 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fanselow M. S. (2010). From contextual fear to a dynamic view of memory systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14 7–15. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources