Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21:12:672910.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.672910. eCollection 2021.

Microbial Community Interactions Are Sensitive to Small Changes in Temperature

Affiliations

Microbial Community Interactions Are Sensitive to Small Changes in Temperature

Emil Burman et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Microbial communities are essential for human and environmental health, often forming complex interaction networks responsible for driving ecosystem processes affecting their local environment and their hosts. Disturbances of these communities can lead to loss of interactions and thereby important ecosystem functionality. The research on what drives interactions in microbial communities is still in its infancy, and much information has been gained from the study of model communities. One purpose of using these model microbial communities is that they can be cultured under controlled conditions. Yet, it is not well known how fluctuations of abiotic factors such as temperature affect their interaction networks. In this work, we have studied the effect of temperature on interactions between the members of the model community THOR, which consists of three bacterial species: Pseudomonas koreensis, Flavobacterium johnsoniae, and Bacillus cereus. Our results show that the community-intrinsic properties resulting from their interspecies interactions are highly dependent on incubation temperature. We also found that THOR biofilms had remarkably different abundances of their members when grown at 11, 18, and 25°C. The results suggest that the sensitivity of community interactions to changes in temperature is influenced, but not completely dictated, by different growth rates of the individual members at different temperatures. Our findings likely extend to other microbial communities and environmental parameters. Thus, temperature could affect community stability and may influence diverse processes including soil productivity, bioprocessing, and disease suppression. Moreover, to establish reproducibility between laboratories working with microbial model communities, it is crucial to ensure experimental stability, including carefully managed temperature conditions.

Keywords: THOR; biofilm; community interactions; microbial communities; temperature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Temperature-dependent biofilm production in THOR. (A) Average amount of biofilm produced by biofilm-producing co- and triple cultures of the THOR members relative to the amount of biofilm produced by the monoculture of Pseudomonas koreensis, which is represented by the dotted line. The y-axis scale is shown as ratios of the Pseudomonas koreensis monoculture biofilm production. (B) Total amount of biofilm produced by THOR members. Temperatures are given in °C. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean across four biological replicates.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Growth (OD600) after 24 h for the THOR members grown alone at different temperatures. Temperatures are shown in °C. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean across the four biological replicates. Note that the growth has been measured when the strains have been grown alone, without the other THOR members.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Number of biofilm CFUs per well for the THOR members grown at different temperatures. Averages across six biological replicates are shown, and the error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barreiro A., Lombao A., Martín A., Cancelo-González J., Carballas T., Díaz-Raviña M. (2020). Soil heating at high temperatures and different water content: effects on the soil microorganisms. Geosciences 10:355. 10.3390/geosciences10090355 - DOI
    1. Bengtsson-Palme J. (2020). Microbial model communities: to understand complexity, harness the power of simplicity. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18 3987–4001. 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.11.043 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blasche S., Kim Y., Oliveira A. P., Patil K. R. (2017). Model microbial communities for ecosystems biology. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 6 51–57. 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.09.002 - DOI
    1. Chevrette M. G., Bratburd J. R., Currie C. R., Stubbendieck R. M. (2019). Experimental microbiomes: models not to scale. MSystems 4:e00175-19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies D. G., Parsek M. R., Pearson J. P., Iglewski B. H., Costerton J. W., Greenberg E. P. (1998). The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280 295–298. 10.1126/science.280.5361.295 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources