Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 22:13:17588359211018022.
doi: 10.1177/17588359211018022. eCollection 2021.

The relative importance of predictive factors for single first-generation EGFR-TKI use for more than 5 years in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Taiwan multicenter TIPS-5 study

Affiliations

The relative importance of predictive factors for single first-generation EGFR-TKI use for more than 5 years in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Taiwan multicenter TIPS-5 study

Yen-Hsiang Huang et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: The relative importance of predictive factors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains unclear.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively enrolled advanced NSCLC patients with single first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment for ⩾5 years (Y) in Taiwan. Clinical data was collected and compared with those of another cohort with single first-line EGFR-TKI treatment for <5 Y. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples were collected from patient subsets, pre- and post-TKI, in the >5 Y group.

Results: Overall, 128 and 278 patients were enrolled in the ⩾5 Y and <5 Y groups, respectively. Significant factors in the multivariate analysis of patients' characteristics including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, postoperative recurrence, without brain metastasis, oligometastasis (each score of 2), female sex, erlotinib use, and without bone metastasis (each score of 1), were incorporated into a risk scoring system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.86]. Of the plasma cfDNA samples from 33 patients in the ⩾5 Y group, only 1 had a T790M in 25 patients without progressive disease. In 27 patients with single agent use for ⩾96 months, 22 (81.5%) received local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) for the primary lung tumor before and during TKI treatment.

Conclusion: For NSCLC patients with single first-generation EGFR-TKI use for ⩾5 Y, factors with different relative importance exist and the risk-scoring model is feasible with modest accuracy. The role of local treatment for primary tumors in patients with long-term TKI use requires further investigation.

Keywords: epidermal growth factor receptor; local treatment; more than five years; non-small cell lung cancer; scoring model; tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The PFS of the ⩾5 year and the <5 year use group. (a) The difference between the ⩾5 year and the <5 year use groups in Kaplan–Meier curve of PFS (b) The distribution of PFS in the ⩾5 year use group. Cum survival, cumulative survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PD, progressive disease.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Nomogram of the multivariate model of the risk scores. The nomogram of the multivariate model of the risk scores were constructed to predict the chances of PFS ⩾5 years with EGFR-TKIs treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients. EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The swimmer plot for PFS in 33 patients of the ⩾5 year use group. The detailed data included treatment PFS, pre-treatment and post-treatment EGFR subtype of cfDNA and tissue biopsy, and the status of progressive disease. cfDNA, circulating free DNA; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PFS, progression-free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al.. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2129–2139. - PubMed
    1. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al.. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004; 304: 1497–1500. - PubMed
    1. Zhou C, Yao LD. Strategies to improve outcomes of patients with EGRF-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: review of the literature. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 174–186. - PubMed
    1. Park K, Tan EH, O’Byrne K, et al.. Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 577–589. - PubMed
    1. Gottschling S, Herpel E, Eberhardt WE, et al.. The gefitinib long-term responder (LTR)-a cancer stem-like cell story? Insights from molecular analyses of German long-term responders treated in the IRESSA expanded access program (EAP). Lung Cancer 2012; 77: 183–191. - PubMed