Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 27;11(35):9593-9603.
doi: 10.1039/d0sc04302h.

A conductive metal-organic framework photoanode

Affiliations

A conductive metal-organic framework photoanode

Brian Pattengale et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

We report the development of photosensitizing arrays based on conductive metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that enable light harvesting and efficient charge separation. Zn2TTFTB (TTFTB = tetrathiafulvalene tetrabenzoate) MOFs are deposited directly onto TiO2 photoanodes and structurally characterized by pXRD and EXAFS measurements. Photoinduced interfacial charge transfer dynamics are investigated by combining time-resolved THz spectroscopy and quantum dynamics simulations. Sub-600 fs electron injection into TiO2 is observed for Zn2TTFTB-TiO2 and is compared to the corresponding dynamics for TTFTB-TiO2 analogues that lack the extended MOF architecture. Rapid electron injection from the MOF into TiO2 is enhanced by facile migration of the hole away from the interfacial region. Holes migrate through strongly coupled HOMO orbitals localized on the tetrathiafulvalene cores of the columnar stacks of the MOF, whereas electrons are less easily transferred through the spiral staircase arrangement of phenyl substituents of the MOF. The reported findings suggest that conductive MOFs could be exploited as novel photosensitizing arrays in applications to slow, and thereby make difficult, photocatalytic reactions such as those required for water-splitting in artificial photosynthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Depiction showing a top (a) and side (b) view of the 3-layer model of Zn2TTFTB conductive MOF in this study. The 3-layer cutout shown is half an optimized unit cell where each layer rotates 60° about the center. The 1 layer cut from an optimized unit cell (c) and the protonated ligand H4TTFTB (d) are shown.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Low 2θ region of the pXRD pattern containing Zn2TTFTB diffractions (a) and Zn K-edge XANES spectra (b). EXAFS spectra in k-space (c) and R-space (d) with data shown as open points and solid best fit lines. Inset of (b) shows a segment of the MOF structure depicting the two unique Zn centers repeating in a chain.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. SEM results for Zn2TTFTB–TiO2. Top-view images (a and b) and cross-section images (c and d) show the formation of a discontinuous monolayer of hemispherical flower-like MOF structures. EDS mapping (e), demonstrating localization of C, S, and Zn within the MOF structures. Scales: (a) 50 μm; (b) 2 μm; (c) 20 μm; (d) 100 μm; (e) 20 μm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. (a) Spectroelectrochemistry of H4TTFTB under oxidation and (b) reduction. (c) Spectroelectrochemistry of Zn2TTFTB–FTO. (d) Nernst plot of Zn2TTFTB–FTO spectroelectrochemistry data at 700 nm. Inset of (a) is the cyclic voltammetry of H4TTFTB in 0.1 M TBAPF6-DMF.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Experimental (solid) and calculated (dashed) normalized UV-visible spectra. Stacked Natural Transition Orbitals (NTOs) show the initial (bottom) and final (top) orbitals for each transition. (a) UV-visible spectrum of H4TTFTB in DMF compared to the diffuse reflectance spectrum of Zn2TTFTB and the calculated neutral ligand in DMF with NTO's for the transition of interest. (b and c) Difference spectra comparison of the experimental and TDDFT calculated H4TTFTB cationic-neutral/anion-neutral species spectra and the NTO's of important features. (d) Comparison of TDDFT calculated spectra for charge varied species and NTO's for the same transition in each species.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. The (a) calculated density of states (DOS) are shown for TTFTB lying (b) flat, long, or tall on the surface, each with 2 attachment points. The HOMO and LUMO positions of the isolated ligand are denoted in red. Full DOS for each joint system orientation are overlaid with the isolated ligand and isolated TiO2 DOS. All DOS containing TiO2 which have been vertically scaled to a maximum peak height of 10. (c) Subtraction of the joint systems from the summation of isolated systems shows the changes in the DOS when the ligand is bound to TiO2. (a) and (c) are both centered on the Fermi level of the joint flat system.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Interfacial electron transfer from H4TTFTB on TiO2 in a flat (top), long (middle), and tall (bottom) orientation.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. OPTP traces for TTFTB-sensitized TiO2 (a) and Zn2TTFTB (b) and their respective normalized traces (c and d). Inset of (d) compares the normalized TTFTB-sensitized trace to the Zn2TTFTB–TiO2 trace at 1.27 mJ cm−2 excitation fluence.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. (a) ns-TA results showing the recombination lifetime and (b) proposed scheme.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Spin densities of the cationic H4TTFTB and 1 layer models. Spin density is represented in blue and is seen on the tetrathiafulvaline core only for an isovalue of 0.0008 for 1 layer Zn2TTFTB (A) and H4TTFTB (B).
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. Proposed electron and hole transfer pathways. Calculations in this work suggest that electrons travel between phenyl stacks and holes through the S-rich TTF core.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bard A. J. Fox M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995;28:141. doi: 10.1021/ar00051a007. - DOI
    1. Meyer T. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989;22:163. doi: 10.1021/ar00161a001. - DOI
    1. Esswein A. J. Nocera D. G. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:4022. doi: 10.1021/cr050193e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen X. Shen S. Guo L. Mao S. S. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:6503. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tachibana Y. Vayssieres L. Durrant J. R. Nat. Photonics. 2012;6:511. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.175. - DOI