Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21:8:656998.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.656998. eCollection 2021.

Understanding Immune Responses to Surgical Transplant Procedures in Stevens Johnsons Syndrome Patients

Affiliations

Understanding Immune Responses to Surgical Transplant Procedures in Stevens Johnsons Syndrome Patients

Matias Soifer et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Stevens Johnsons syndrome (SJS) is a mucocutaneous disorder caused by an autoimmune response most commonly to medications. Unless it is properly managed in the acute setting, this entity can affect the ocular surface causing chronic cicatrizing conjunctivitis with limbal stem cell deficiency and lid anomalies which ultimately result in corneal opacities that may limit patients' visual acuity. When this stage is reached, some patients might need to undergo some form of corneal and/or limbal stem cell transplantation that exposes an already sensitized immune system to a new alloantigen. While the innate immunity plays a role in corneal graft survival, adaptive immune responses play a major part in corneal graft rejection and failure, namely through CD4+ T cell lymphocytes. Hence, the management of the immune response to surgical transplant procedures in SJS patients, involves a dual approach that modulates the inflammatory response to a new alloantigen in the context of an autoimmune sensitized patient. This review will explore and discuss current perspectives and future directions in the field of ocular immunology on how to manage SJS immune responses to ocular surgical procedures, reviewing systemic and local immunosuppressive therapies and protocols to adequately manage this debilitating condition.

Keywords: Stevens Johnsons; corneal transplant; high risk corneal transplantation; immunosuppression; limbal stem cell transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RBL is a compensated consultant/advisory board member for and equity holder in Heat Biologics. VLP has worked as a compensated consultant for Alcon, Eyegate, Oculis, Novartis, Trefoil, Quidel, Dompe and is a board member of OBTears. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Molecular targets of immunomodulatory medications. Illustration of the mechanism of action and molecular targets of the immunomodulatory agents commonly used in the control of the alloimmune and autoimmune response in Stevens Johnsons Syndrome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Combination of BET inhibition and T-reg expansion to target immune responses. In response to the presentation of novel antigens, as in the case of an ocular surface transplant, the resident immune cells activate and, through bromodomain-regulated activation of transcription, produce inflammatory cytokines which leads to recruitment of effector cells which carry out non-specific innate immune response. In addition, activated immune cells may also function as antigen presenting cells through MHC-II expression and migrate to draining lymph nodes where activation of antigen specific CD4+ T-cells takes place resulting in cytokine dependent specific immune response activation of the adaptive immune response. Dual therapy using BET-inhibitors mainly targeting the cytokine-dependent innate response along with T-reg expansion therapy targeting the activation of the adaptive response can potentially control immune responses and suppress inflammatory disease. The two modalities have been shown to not interfere with one another and can effectively provide a compound strategy for inflammatory control.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Naldi L, Halevy S, Bavinck JNB, et al. . Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-Study. J Invest Dermatol. (2008) 128:35–44. 10.1038/sj.jid.5701033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan HL, Stern RS, Arndt KA, Langlois J, Jick SS, Jick H, et al. . The incidence of erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. A population-based study with particular reference to reactions caused by drugs among outpatients. Arch Dermatol. (1990) 126:43–7. 10.1001/archderm.126.1.43 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rzany B, Mockenhaupt M, Baur S, Schröder W, Stocker U, Mueller J, et al. . Epidemiology of erythema exsudativum multiforme majus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Germany (1990–1992): structure and results of a population-based registry. J Clin Epidemiol. (1996) 49:769–73. 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00035-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diphoorn J, Cazzaniga S, Gamba C, Schroeder J, Citterio A, Rivolta AL, et al. . Incidence, causative factors and mortality rates of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) in northern Italy: data from the REACT registry: incidence of SJS and TEN in northern Italy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. (2016) 25:196–203. 10.1002/pds.3937 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohanim S, Palioura S, Saeed HN, Akpek EK, Amescua G, Basu S, et al. . Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis – a comprehensive review and guide to therapy. I. systemic disease. Ocul Surf. (2016) 14:2–19. 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.10.002 - DOI - PubMed