Filmed Monologue Vignettes: a novel method for investigating how clinicians document consultations in electronic health records
- PMID: 34095518
- PMCID: PMC8142957
- DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i1.430
Filmed Monologue Vignettes: a novel method for investigating how clinicians document consultations in electronic health records
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The accuracy of conclusions from research based on Electronic Healthcare Records (EHRs) is highly dependent on the correct selection of descriptors (codes) by users, but few methods exist for examining quality and drivers of documentation. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of filmed vignette monologues as a resource-light method of assessing and comparing how different EHR users record the same clinical scenario.
Methods: Six short monologues portraying simulated patients presenting allergic conditions to their General Practitioners were filmed head-on then electronically distributed for the study; no researcher was present during data collection. The method was assessed by participant uptake, reported ease of completion by participants, compliance with instructions, the receipt of interpretable data by researchers, and participant perceptions of vignette quality, realism and information content.
Results: Twenty-two participants completed the study, reporting only minor difficulties. 132 screenshots were returned electronically, enabling analysis of codes, free text and EHR features. Participants assigned a quality rating of 7.7/10 (range 2-10) to the vignettes and rated the extent to which vignettes reflected real-life at 93% (range 86-100%). Between 1 and 2 hours were required to complete the task. Full compliance with instructions varied between participants, but was largely successful.
Conclusions: Filmed monologues are a reproducible, standardized method, which require relatively few resources, yet allow clear assessment of clinicians' and EHRs systems' impact on documentation. The novel nature of this method necessitates clear instructions, so participants can fully complete the study without face-to-face researcher supervision.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Adult patient access to electronic health records.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33634854 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Patient Engagement Tools in Electronic Health Records to Enhance Patient-Centered Communication: Protocol for Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Results.JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e30431. doi: 10.2196/30431. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. PMID: 34435960 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Prestudy Assessment of a Dashboard for Presenting Self-Collected Health Data of Patients With Diabetes to Clinicians: Iterative Approach and Qualitative Case Study.JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Jul 9;4(3):e14002. doi: 10.2196/14002. JMIR Diabetes. 2019. PMID: 31290396 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping communication spaces: The development and use of a tool for analyzing the impact of EHRs on interprofessional collaborative practice.Int J Med Inform. 2016 Sep;93:2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 20. Int J Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 27435942
-
Clinicians' reasoning as reflected in electronic clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):172-184. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy155. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30576561 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Royal College of General Practitioners. GP Patient Survey shows concerning rise in waiting times for GP appointments, says RCGP 2017 [Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/about-us/news/2017/july/gp-patient-survey-shows-c...]
-
- Read J, Benson T. Comprehensive coding. British Journal of Healthcare Computing. 1986:22-5.
-
- CPRD. CPRD Bibliography [Available from: https://www.cprd.com/Bibliography/]
-
- Sechidis K, Calvo B, Brown G, editors. Statistical Hypothesis Testing in Positive Unlabelled Data. ECML/PKDD (3); 2014. 10.1007/978-3-662-44845-8_5 - DOI
-
- Johansen MA, Scholl J, Hasvold P, Ellingsen G, Bellika JG, editors. Garbage in, garbage out: extracting disease surveillance data from EPR systems in primary care. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work; 2008: ACM. 10.1055/s-0029-1214399 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources