Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 12;4(1):586.
doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586.

Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research

Affiliations

Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research

Mhairi Aitken et al. Int J Popul Data Sci. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Dr. Aitken reports grants from The Farr Institute at The University of Manchester is supported by a 10-funder consortium led by the MRC (Grant No: MR/M501633/2), during the conduct of the study; Dr. Black reports grants from Farr Institute UK (MRC collaboration), grants from ESRC (ADRC-Scotland), during the conduct of the study; Dr Cunningham-Burley reports grants from Farr Institute UK (MRC collaboration (Grant No: MR/M501633/2), grants from ESRC (ADRC-Scotland), during the conduct of the study; Dr. Denegri reports non-financial support and other from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), personal fees and non-financial support from University College London, personal fees from Google DeepMind Health, grants from Wellcome Trust, other from a wide range of engagements, speaking invitations and requests for advice consistent with my expertise some of which relates to the submitted work, outside the submitted work; Dr. Goddard reports grants from MRC, during the conduct of the study; Dr. Tully reports grants from The Farr Institute at The University of Manchester which is supported by a 10-funder consortium led by the MRC (Grant No: MR/M501633/2), during the conduct of the study; non-financial support from EuroRec Institute, non-financial support from BioData World Congress, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1: Adapted from Davidson et al 2013 [12]
Figure 1: Adapted from Davidson et al 2013 [12]

References

    1. Academy of Medical Sciences. Exploring A New Social Contract for Medical Innovation. 2015, www.acmedsci.ac.uk
    1. Carter P, Laurie GT, Dixon-Woods M. The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble. Journal of medical ethics. 23January2015:medethics-2014. 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garrety K, McLoughlin I, Wilson R, Zelle G, Martin M. National electronic health records and the digital disruption of moral orders. Social Science & Medicine. 1January2014;101:70-7. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Research Councils UK. Concordat for Engaging the Public with Research. A set of principles drawn up by the Funders of Research in the UK [Online]. 2010. Available: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/scisoc/concordatforengagingthepublicwith... [Accessed 27/06/2017].
    1. Irwin A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘new’scientific governance. Social studies of science. April2006;36(2):299-320. 10.1177/0306312706053350 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources