Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 27;5(3):278-286.
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12430. eCollection 2021 May.

Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Affiliations
Review

Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Toshiyuki Kosuga et al. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. .

Abstract

Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is "function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG)." FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long-term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper-third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle-third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials.

Keywords: function‐preserving gastrectomy; gastric cancer; proximal gastrectomy; pylorus‐preserving gastrectomy; subtotal gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

References

    1. Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kubota T, Jiang X. Function‐preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2683–92. - PubMed
    1. Nunobe S, Ida S. Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4(5):498–504. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, et al. Long‐term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(1):141–5. - PubMed
    1. Jung DH, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2015;15(2):77–86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018. 5th ed. Gastric Cancer; 2020. - PMC - PubMed