Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;43(9):2822-2843.
doi: 10.1002/hed.26767. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Adjuvant therapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year review

Affiliations
Review

Adjuvant therapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year review

Jason G Newman et al. Head Neck. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Standard of care for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is surgical excision of the primary lesion with clear margins when possible, and additional resection of positive margins when feasible. Even with negative margins, certain high-risk factors warrant consideration of adjuvant therapy. However, which patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy is unclear, and supporting evidence is conflicting and limited to mostly small retrospective cohorts. Here, we review literature from the last decade regarding adjuvant radiation therapy and systemic therapy in high-risk cSCC, including recent and current trials and the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We demonstrate evidence gaps in adjuvant therapy for high-risk cSCC and the need for prognostic tools, such as gene expression profiling, to guide patient selection. More large-cohort clinical studies are needed for collecting high-quality, evidence-based data for determining which patients with high-risk cSCC may benefit from adjuvant therapy and which therapy is most appropriate for patient management.

Keywords: adjuvant chemotherapy; adjuvant radiation therapy; cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; immunotherapy; targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Newman is a consultant for Bolder Surgical, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Koyfman receives research funding and consulting fees from Merck, research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, and honoraria from UpToDate. Drs. Hall, Kurley, and Cook are employees and options holders. Dr. Farberg serves as a consultant. Drs. Newman and Koyfman are investigators for Castle Biosciences, Inc. Dr. Geiger receives research funding from Regeneron, Genentech, and Alkermes; and consulting fees from Regeneron. The 40‐gene expression profile (40‐GEP) test described in this manuscript was developed by Castle Biosciences, Inc. and is clinically offered as DecisionDx‐SCC (Castle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phillips TJ, Harris BN, Moore MG, Farwell DG, Bewley AF. Pathological margins and advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48:55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marrazzo G, Zitelli JA, Brodland D. Clinical outcomes in high‐risk squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery alone. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:633‐638. - PubMed
    1. Tschetter AJ, Campoli MR, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Long‐term clinical outcomes of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: a 5‐year, multicenter, prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:139‐148. - PubMed
    1. Motley R, Arron S. Mohs micrographic surgery for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:233‐234. - PubMed
    1. Belkin D, Carucci JA. Mohs surgery for squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Clin. 2011;29:161‐174. - PubMed