Adjuvant therapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year review
- PMID: 34096664
- PMCID: PMC8453797
- DOI: 10.1002/hed.26767
Adjuvant therapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year review
Abstract
Standard of care for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is surgical excision of the primary lesion with clear margins when possible, and additional resection of positive margins when feasible. Even with negative margins, certain high-risk factors warrant consideration of adjuvant therapy. However, which patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy is unclear, and supporting evidence is conflicting and limited to mostly small retrospective cohorts. Here, we review literature from the last decade regarding adjuvant radiation therapy and systemic therapy in high-risk cSCC, including recent and current trials and the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We demonstrate evidence gaps in adjuvant therapy for high-risk cSCC and the need for prognostic tools, such as gene expression profiling, to guide patient selection. More large-cohort clinical studies are needed for collecting high-quality, evidence-based data for determining which patients with high-risk cSCC may benefit from adjuvant therapy and which therapy is most appropriate for patient management.
Keywords: adjuvant chemotherapy; adjuvant radiation therapy; cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; immunotherapy; targeted therapy.
© 2021 Castle Biosciences, Inc. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Newman is a consultant for Bolder Surgical, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Koyfman receives research funding and consulting fees from Merck, research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, and honoraria from UpToDate. Drs. Hall, Kurley, and Cook are employees and options holders. Dr. Farberg serves as a consultant. Drs. Newman and Koyfman are investigators for Castle Biosciences, Inc. Dr. Geiger receives research funding from Regeneron, Genentech, and Alkermes; and consulting fees from Regeneron. The 40‐gene expression profile (40‐GEP) test described in this manuscript was developed by Castle Biosciences, Inc. and is clinically offered as DecisionDx‐SCC (Castle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX).
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis and treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline.Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1989-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.110. Epub 2015 Jul 25. Eur J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26219687 Review.
-
European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment.Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:83-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 26. Eur J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32113942
-
An evolving paradigm for the workup and management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Oct;69(4):595-602.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jul 17. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23871719
-
Non-melanoma skin cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S125-S132. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000554. J Laryngol Otol. 2016. PMID: 27841126 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic Immunotherapy for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019 Mar 14;20(4):30. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0629-2. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30874952 Review.
Cited by
-
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Pathological Features and What They Mean for Prognosis and Treatment.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 17;16(16):2866. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162866. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39199636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Management.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;14(15):3653. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153653. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35954316 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting adjuvant radiation therapy benefit in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with the 40-gene expression profile.Future Oncol. 2024;20(35):2737-2746. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2390820. Epub 2024 Sep 4. Future Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39229801 Free PMC article.
-
PD-L1 Inhibitor Cosibelimab for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comprehensive Evaluation of Efficacy, Mechanism, and Clinical Trial Insights.Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 7;13(4):889. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040889. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40299523 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Analysis of Molecular Subtypes and Immune Prediction Based on CD8 T Cell Pattern Genes Based on Head and Neck Cancer.J Oncol. 2022 Aug 25;2022:1500493. doi: 10.1155/2022/1500493. eCollection 2022. J Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36059811 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Marrazzo G, Zitelli JA, Brodland D. Clinical outcomes in high‐risk squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery alone. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:633‐638. - PubMed
-
- Tschetter AJ, Campoli MR, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Long‐term clinical outcomes of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: a 5‐year, multicenter, prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:139‐148. - PubMed
-
- Motley R, Arron S. Mohs micrographic surgery for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:233‐234. - PubMed
-
- Belkin D, Carucci JA. Mohs surgery for squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Clin. 2011;29:161‐174. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical