Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 7;5(6):e25083.
doi: 10.2196/25083.

Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment

Aubri Hoffman  1 , Laura Crocker  2 , Aakrati Mathur  3 , Deborah Holman  1 , June Weston  1 , Sukhkamal Campbell  4 , Ashley Housten  2 , Andrea Bradford  5 , Shilpi Agrawala  4 , Terri L Woodard  1   4
Affiliations

Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment

Aubri Hoffman et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: As cancer treatments continue to improve, it is increasingly important that women of reproductive age have an opportunity to decide whether they want to undergo fertility preservation treatments to try to protect their ability to have a child after cancer. Clinical practice guidelines recommend that providers offer fertility counseling to all young women with cancer; however, as few as 12% of women recall discussing fertility preservation. The long-term goal of this program is to develop an interactive web-based patient decision aid to improve awareness, access, knowledge, and decision making for all young women with cancer. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards collaboration recommends a formal decision-making needs assessment to inform and guide the design of understandable, meaningful, and usable patient decision aid interventions.

Objective: This study aims to assess providers' and survivors' fertility preservation decision-making experiences, unmet needs, and initial design preferences to inform the development of a web-based patient decision aid.

Methods: Semistructured interviews and an ad hoc focus group assessed current decision-making experiences, unmet needs, and recommendations for a patient decision aid. Two researchers coded and analyzed the transcripts using NVivo (QSR International). A stakeholder advisory panel guided the study and interpretation of results.

Results: A total of 51 participants participated in 46 interviews (18 providers and 28 survivors) and 1 ad hoc focus group (7 survivors). The primary themes included the importance of fertility decisions for survivorship, the existence of significant but potentially modifiable barriers to optimal decision making, and a strong support for developing a carefully designed patient decision aid website. Providers reported needing an intervention that could quickly raise awareness and facilitate timely referrals. Survivors reported needing understandable information and help with managing uncertainty, costs, and pressures. Design recommendations included providing tailored information (eg, by age and cancer type), optional interactive features, and multimedia delivery at multiple time points, preferably outside the consultation.

Conclusions: Decision making about fertility preservation is an important step in providing high-quality comprehensive cancer care and a priority for many survivors' optimal quality of life. Decision support interventions are needed to address gaps in care and help women quickly navigate toward an informed, values-congruent decision. Survivors and providers support developing a patient decision aid website to make information directly available to women outside of the consultation and to provide self-tailored content according to women's clinical characteristics and their information-seeking and deliberative styles.

Keywords: cancer; decision support techniques; fertility preservation; needs assessment; oncofertility; oncology; patient decision aids; patient needs; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Ottawa Decision Support Framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration model for systematic development of a patient decision aid.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rosen A, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Rosenzweig L. Psychosocial distress in young cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2009 Nov;25(4):268–77. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2009.08.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carter J, Chi DS, Brown CL, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, Aghajanian C, Levine DA, Baser RE, Raviv L, Barakat RR. Cancer-related infertility in survivorship. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Jan;20(1):2–8. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bf7d3f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canada AL, Schover LR. The psychosocial impact of interrupted childbearing in long-term female cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2012 Feb;21(2):134–43. doi: 10.1002/pon.1875. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22271533 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deshpande NA, Braun IM, Meyer FL. Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: a systematic review. Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):3938–47. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29637. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29637. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, Quinn G, Wallace WH, Oktay K. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 01;31(19):2500–10. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.49.2678. - DOI - PMC - PubMed