Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;32(4):693-700.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03017-w. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Comparison of short-stem versus conventional stem for hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: 7-14 years follow-up

Arnaldo Sousa  1   2 , João Vale  3   4 , Sara Diniz  3   4 , Pedro Neves  3   4 , Joaquim Ramos  3   4 , Rafaela Coelho  3   4
Affiliations

Comparison of short-stem versus conventional stem for hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: 7-14 years follow-up

Arnaldo Sousa et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Short-stem prostheses in hip arthroplasty have emerged as an alternative to conventional stems, especially in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to compare functional and radiological results of a short metaphyseal fitting cementless stem versus a conventional stem implant, in patients younger than 60 years.

Methods: All patients operated from January 2006 to April 2013 were included, obtaining a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and SF-36 (quality of life) questionnaires were applied and the presence of "thigh pain" was specifically assessed. We also compared complication rate, revision rate and average prosthesis survival. Femoral stress shielding (Gruen scale), stem subsidence, varus-valgus tilt and implant stability (Engh scale) were also compared.

Results: A total of 101 short-stem and 74 conventional arthroplasties were included, with an average follow-up of 9.82 (7-14) years. HHS functional score and SF-36 were excellent in both implants and no significant difference between them (p > 0.05) was found. However, "thigh pain" was present in 7 patients with conventional stems and none with short-stems (p < 0.001). The survival rate at 13 years was 99%, for both implants, and no significant differences were found between them (χ2(2) = 0.178; p = 0.673). Conventional stems had stress shielding at the greater trochanter in 72% of the cases and 43% at the calcar, being statistically superior (p < 0.001) to the stress shielding observed in the short stems.

Conclusion: According to our results, this short-stem seems to allow preservation of bone stock, with decreased stress shielding and also a lower incidence of thigh pain compared to conventional stems.

Level of evidence: Level III retrospective comparative study.

Keywords: Engh scale; Harris hip score; Hip arthroplasty; SF-36; Short-stem; Stress shielding; Thigh pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K et al (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606–2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0834-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Skyttä ET, Jarkko L, Antti E et al (2011) Increasing incidence of hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in 30-to 59-year-old patients: a population based study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 82:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.548029 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. MJ D, (2009) Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide. Orthopedics 32:32
    1. AOA (2014) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report

LinkOut - more resources