Long-Term Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Experience with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years
- PMID: 34097238
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05455-1
Long-Term Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Experience with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the OAGB at least 10 years after surgery.
Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected data on consecutive morbid patients with obesity receiving OAGB from January 2005 to December 2007.
Results: A total of 385 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 149 months. Of all patients, 52% underwent OAGB as a primary procedure and 48% as a revisional procedure. At the 10-year follow-up, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.7 ± 11.8, the mean %TWL was 33.4 ± 10.6, and the mean %EWL was 64.1 ± 24.6. We did not find a significant statistical difference in terms of weight loss between primary OAGB and secondary OAGB. In total, 43% of patients achieved a %EWL greater than 75%, while 29% of the patients had an EWL% that was below 50%. All of the comorbidities related to obesity showed a high improvement or fully resolved. Early complications occurred in 9 patients (2.3%), while the overall rate of late complications was 17.1%. Nineteen patients (4.9%) developed an ulcer at the gastrojejunal anastomosis level, nine patients (2.3%) were re-hospitalized for major malnutrition, thirty-eight patients (9.8%) showed a postoperative biliary reflux, and five patients (2.7%) experienced severe anemia, which required several hospitalizations for iron I.V. supplementation.
Conclusion: According to results of the present study, we believe that OAGB has shown to be a technique with a reasonable balance between long-term efficacy and undesirable sequelae.
Keywords: Biliary reflux; Long-term follow-up; Long-term results; Marginal ulcer; One anastomosis gastric bypass.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Franco JV, Ruiz PA, Palermo M, et al. A review of studies comparing three laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1458–68. - DOI
-
- Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3783–94. - DOI
-
- Magouliotis DE, VS T, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: an updated metaanalysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2721–30. - DOI
-
- Parmar CD, Bryant C, Luque-de-Leon E, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2: a systematic review comparing it with Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3039–46. - DOI
-
- Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, et al. IFSO (International Federation of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) consensus conference statement on oneanastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30:1625–34. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
