Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;45(4):376-384.
doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13123. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Progress in the Pacific on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019

Andrea Teng  1 , Wendy Snowdon  2 , Si Thu Win Tin  3 , Murat Genç  4 , Elisiva Na'ati  3 , Viliami Puloka  1 , Louise Signal  1 , Nick Wilson  1
Affiliations
Free article

Progress in the Pacific on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: a systematic review of policy changes from 2000 to 2019

Andrea Teng et al. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To systematically characterise sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax policy changes in Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs) from 2000 to 2019.

Methods: Medline, Google Scholar, Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute database, Factiva and news and government websites were systematically searched up to October 2019. Information was extracted on the date and SSB tax level change, tax type, included beverages, and earmarking; and checked for consistency with local experts.

Results: Three-quarters of PICTs had an SSB tax (n=16/21) and 11 of these were excise taxes that included both imported and locally produced beverages. The level of tax was over 20% in 14 jurisdictions. SSB tax was increased by more than 20 percentage points in eight PICTs. Most taxes were ad valorem or volumetric, three were earmarked and only two taxes targeted sugar-sweetened fruit juices. The majority of countries (14/21) had different tax rates for imported and locally produced beverages.

Conclusions: More than three-quarters of PICTs have SSB taxes. More than one-third increased these taxes since 2000 at an amount that is expected to reduce soft drink consumption. Implications for public health: Despite high-quality tax design elements in some PICTs, SSB control policies could generally be strengthened to improve health benefits, e.g. by targeting all SSBs and earmarking revenue for health.

Keywords: Pacific; beverage; excise; soft drink; sugar.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grummon AH, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D, Allcott H. Designing better sugary drink taxes: Tax the sugar, not the liquid. Science. 2019;365(6457):989-90.
    1. McDonald A. Sugar-sweetened Beverage Tax in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: A Discussion Paper. Noumea (NCL): Secretariat of the Pacific Community; 2015.
    1. Kessaram T, McKenzie J, Girin N, Roth A, Vivili P, Williams G, et al. Noncommunicable diseases and risk factors in adult populations of several Pacific Islands: Results from the WHO STEPwise approach to surveillance. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39(4):336-43.
    1. World Population Review. Most Obese Countries Population 2019 [Internet]. Walnut (CA): WP Review; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 25]. Available from: http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/most-obese-countries/
    1. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas 2019. 9th ed. Brusselss (BEL): IDF; 2019.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources