Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Sep;26(5):e12864.
doi: 10.1111/anec.12864. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations

Affiliations
Observational Study

Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations

Nikola N Radovanović et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm-monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias.

Methods: This has been a retrospective, observational, single-center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations.

Results: The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow-up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients' characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation.

Conclusions: ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process.

Keywords: arrhythmia; implantable loop recorder; palpitations; syncope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The Kaplan‐Meier estimates of time to diagnostic event in patients who underwent basic vs. extended diagnostics before implantable loop recorder implantation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed, N., Frontera, A., Carpenter, A., Cataldo, S., Connolly, G. M., Fasiolo, M., Cripps, T., Thomas, G., Diab, I., & Duncan, E. R. (2015). Clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation in patients with syncope receiving implantable loop recorder with or without ECG conduction abnormalities. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 38, 934–941. 10.1111/pace.12666 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bisignani, A., De Bonis, S., Mancuso, L., Ceravolo, G., & Bisignani, G. (2019). Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice. Journal of Arrhythmia, 35, 25–32. 10.1002/joa3.12142 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bovin, A., Malczynski, J., & Dalsgaard, D. (2012). Implantable loop recorder is an effective diagnostic tool for unexplained syncope. Danish Medical Journal, 59, A4518. - PubMed
    1. Brignole, M., Alboni, P., Benditt, D. G., Bergfeldt, L., Blanc, J. J., Bloch Thomsen, P. E., & Wieling, W. (2004). Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope ‐ update 2004. Europace, 6, 467–537. 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.08.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brignole, M., Donateo, P., Tomaino, M., Massa, R., Iori, M., Beiras, X., Moya, A., Kus, T., Deharo, J. C., Giuli, S., Gentili, A., & Sutton, R. (2014). Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE‐3). Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 7, 10–16. 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001103 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types