Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;23(9):2361-2367.
doi: 10.1111/codi.15769. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Laparoscopic wedge resection as an alternative to laparoscopic oncological colon resection for benign endoscopically unresectable colon polyps

Affiliations

Laparoscopic wedge resection as an alternative to laparoscopic oncological colon resection for benign endoscopically unresectable colon polyps

Carla Christine Maria Marres et al. Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate, by comparing clinical and histological outcomes, whether laparoscopic (hybrid) wedge resection (LWR) could be a less invasive and safe alternative to laparoscopic oncological colon resection (OCR) for patients with an endoscopically unresectable, suspected benign, colon polyp.

Method: All patients with an endoscopically unresectable colon polyp who were referred for surgery between 2009 and 2018 and without biopsy-proven colon cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with macroscopic features of malignancy during endoscopy were excluded. Clinical and histological results for patients who underwent OCR or LWR were reviewed.

Results: One hundred-and-twenty-two patients were included. Ninety-seven patients underwent OCR and 25 LWR. Major complications occurred in 16.7% (n = 16) of the OCR group compared with 4.0% (n = 1) of the LWR group (p = 0.06). In the OCR group the anastomotic leakage rate was 6.3% (n = 6) and the mortality rate 3.1% (n = 3). No anastomotic leakage or deaths occurred in the LWR group. The median length of hospital stay after OCR was 5 days [interquartile range (IQR) 5-9 days)] compared with 2 days (IQR 2-4 days) after LWR (p < 0.0001). Definite pathology showed a malignancy rate of 4.2% (n = 4) in the OCR group and 4.0% (n = 1) (without high-risk features) in the LWR group.

Conclusion: This study shows that LWR was associated with significantly lower complication rates and acceptable oncological risks compared with OCR. Therefore we suggest that LWR is a safe alternative treatment, next to other endoscopic options. The treatment that is most suitable for an individual patient should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Keywords: colon polyps; colorectal surgery; laparoscopic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this study has financial or other relationships that may cause a conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Marres CC, Buskens CJ, Schriever E, Verbeek PCM, Mundt MW, Bemelman WA, et al. The impact of the national bowel screening program in the Netherlands on detection and treatment of endoscopically unresectable benign polyps. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(11):887–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li M, Ali SM, Umm‐a‐OmarahGilani S, Liu J, Li Y‐Q, Zuo X‐L. Kudo’s pit pattern classification for colorectal neoplasms: a meta‐analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(35):12649–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peter V, Draganov MD. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for colon polyps. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;14(1):50–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, Nas H, Thompson C. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(10):E1030–E1044. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt A, Bauerfeind P, Gubler C, Damm M, Bauder M, Caca K, et al. Endoscopic full‐thickness resection in the colorectum with a novel over‐the‐scope device: first experience. Endoscopy. 2015;47:719–25. - PubMed