Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Jun 7;16(1):165.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01543-6.

Comparison of the clinical effect between the lower sternal incision and the left parasternal fourth intercostal incision in the transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the clinical effect between the lower sternal incision and the left parasternal fourth intercostal incision in the transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect

Jun Ma et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: To analyze the clinical effect of two different ways of minimally invasive transthoracic closure in children with ventricular septal defect (VSD).

Methods: From January 2015 to July 2019, 294 children with VSD were enrolled in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups - those who underwent VSD closure through the left sternal fourth intercostal incision (group A: n = 95) and the lower sternal incision (group B: n = 129).

Results: The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring time, postoperative hospitalization time and complication rate in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation success rate, mechanical ventilation time and total hospitalization cost (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect through the left sternal fourth intercostal incision is feasible, safe, cosmetic, and worth popularizing.

Keywords: Cardiac intervention; Congenital heart diseases; Ventricular septal defect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
left sternal fourth intercostal incision
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
lower sternal incision
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Blocking operation diagram under TEE. ①:Evaluate the VSD size under TEE and select the appropriate occluder.②:The guide wire passed through the ventricular septal defect through the trocar guided by ultrasound.③:Release the left ventricle occlusion umbrella and pull it close to the left ventricle④:There was no significant residual shunt in the TEE assessment

References

    1. Pinto RJ, Dalvi BV, Sharma S. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using amplatz- erasymmetricventricular septal defect occluder: preliminary experience with 18 - month follow up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68(1):145–152. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20813. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Q, Hong Z-N, Zhang G-c, Chen L-w, Zhang Q-L, Lin Z-W, Cao HuaIntraoperative device closure of isolated ventricular septal defects: experience on 1,090 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;108(6):1797–1802. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nancy A, Ayres WM-H, Derek A, et al. Indications and Guidelines for Performance of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Patient with Pediatric Acquired or Congenital Heart Disease [J] J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(1):91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang W, Zhou S, Fan T, et al. Midterm Results of Transaxillary Occluder Device Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect Guided Solely by Transesophageal Echocardiography. [J]. Heart Surgery Forum. 2019;22(2). - PubMed
    1. Roos-Hesselink JW, Meijboom FJ, Spitaels SE, Van Domburg R, Van Rijen EH, Utens EM, Bogers AJ, Simoons ML. Outcome of patients after surgical closure of ventricular septal defect at young age: longitudinal follow-up of 22-34 years. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(12):1057–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources