Interhospital variability in health care-associated infections and payments after durable ventricular assist device implant among Medicare beneficiaries
- PMID: 34099272
- PMCID: PMC10150658
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.074
Interhospital variability in health care-associated infections and payments after durable ventricular assist device implant among Medicare beneficiaries
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate variations across hospitals in infection rates and associated costs, the latter reflected in 90-day Medicare payments. Despite high rates and expenditures of health care--associated infections associated with durable ventricular assist device implantation, few studies have examined interhospital variation and associated costs.
Methods: Clinical data on 8688 patients who received primary durable ventricular assist devices from July 2008 to July 2017 from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) hospitals (n = 120) were merged with postimplantation 90-day Medicare claims. Terciles of hospital-specific, risk-adjusted infection rates per 100 patient-months were estimated using Intermacs and associated with Medicare payments (among 5440 Medicare beneficiaries). Primary outcomes included infections within 90 days of implantation and Medicare payments.
Results: There were 3982 infections identified among 27.8% (2417/8688) of patients developing an infection. The median (25th, 75th percentile) adjusted incidence of infections (per 100 patient-months) across hospitals was 14.3 (9.3, 19.5) and varied according to hospital (range, 0.0-35.6). Total Medicare payments from implantation to 90 days were 9.0% (absolute difference: $13,652) greater in high versus low infection tercile hospitals (P < .0001). The period between implantation to discharge accounted for 73.1% of the difference in payments during the implantation to 90-day period across terciles.
Conclusions: Health care--associated infection rates post durable ventricular assist device implantation varied according to hospital and were associated with increased 90-day Medicare expenditures. Interventions targeting preventing infections could improve the value of durable ventricular assist device support from the societal and hospital perspectives.
Keywords: expenditure; infection; ventricular assist device.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Donald S. Likosky received extramural support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, R01HS026003) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI – outside of this work).
Francis D. Pagani is a member of the scientific advisory board of FineHeart, Inc, member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Carmat, Inc, member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for the National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute PumpKIN clinical trial, and Chair of The STS Intermacs Task Force.
Data for this study were provided, in part, by Intermacs, previously funded, in part, by the NHLBI under Contract No. HHSN268201100025C. This study was undertaken prior to the acquisition of Intermacs by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Opinions expressed in this manuscript do not represent those of STS Intermacs, NHLBI, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the US Food and Drug Administration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, or the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Research use of these data was approved by Michigan Medicine’s Institutional Review Board (HUM00155687). Written informed consent for registrant participation in Intermacs was required until Protocol v4.0 (February 27, 2014).
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary: When the data are precise and imperfect.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1569. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 May 15. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 34112504 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Durable left ventricular assist device infections: A call to arms.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Nov;164(5):1570-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jun 17. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 34217539 No abstract available.
References
-
- Miller LW. Left ventricular assist devices are underutilized. Circulation. 2011;123(14):1552–1558; discussion 1558. - PubMed
-
- Hannan MM, Xie R, Cowger J, et al. Epidemiology of infection in mechanical circulatory support: A global analysis from the ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38(4):364–373. - PubMed
-
- Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(12):1495–1504. - PubMed
-
- Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(2):141–156. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
