Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Jul;50(5):1907-1912.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02047-z. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Response to Commentaries: Understanding Women's Responses to Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting

Jennifer Jo Connor  1 , Sonya S Brady  2 , Nicole Chaisson  3 , Fatima Sharif Mohamed  4 , Beatrice Bean E Robinson  5
Affiliations
Comment

Response to Commentaries: Understanding Women's Responses to Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting

Jennifer Jo Connor et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul.
No abstract available

Keywords: Female genital cutting; Pain response model; Sexual pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The integrative psychological pain response model: potential responses to pain among women who have experienced female genital cutting
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

References

    1. Abdulcadir J (2018). Psychosexual health after female genital mutilation/cutting and clitoral reconstruction. In Griffin G & Jordal M (Eds.), Body, migration, re/constructive surgeries: Making the gendered body in a globalized world (pp.19–38). Routledge.
    1. Abdulcadir J, & Catania L (2020). Conceptualizing sexual pain in women with female genital mutilation/cutting [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 10.1007/s10508-020-01691-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alsibiani SA, & Rouzi AA (2010). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and Sterility, 93(3), 722–724. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg RC, Taraldsen S, Said MA, Sørbye IK, & Vangen S (2017). Reasons for and experiences with surgical interventions for female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): A systematic review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(8), 977–990. 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brady SS, Connor JJ, Chaisson N, Mohamed FS, & Robinson BBE (2019). Female genital cutting and deinfibulation: Applying the theory of planned behavior to research and practice. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 10.1007/s10508-019-1427-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources