A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians' communication of uncertainty
- PMID: 34101951
- PMCID: PMC8369117
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13255
A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians' communication of uncertainty
Abstract
Background: Health-care providers increasingly have to discuss uncertainty with patients. Awareness of uncertainty can affect patients variably, depending on how it is communicated. To date, no overview existed for health-care professionals on how to discuss uncertainty.
Objective: To generate an overview of available recommendations on how to communicate uncertainty with patients during clinical encounters.
Search strategy: A scoping review was conducted. Four databases were searched following the PRISMA-ScR statement. Independent screening by two researchers was performed of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full texts.
Inclusion criteria: Any (non-)empirical papers were included describing recommendations for any health-care provider on how to orally communicate uncertainty to patients.
Data extraction: Data on provided recommendations and their characteristics (eg, target group and strength of evidence base) were extracted. Recommendations were narratively synthesized into a comprehensible overview for clinical practice.
Results: Forty-seven publications were included. Recommendations were based on empirical findings in 23 publications. After narrative synthesis, 13 recommendations emerged pertaining to three overarching goals: (a) preparing for the discussion of uncertainty, (b) informing patients about uncertainty and (c) helping patients deal with uncertainty.
Discussion and conclusions: A variety of recommendations on how to orally communicate uncertainty are available, but most lack an evidence base. More substantial research is needed to assess the effects of the suggested communicative approaches. Until then, health-care providers may use our overview of communication strategies as a toolbox to optimize communication about uncertainty with patients.
Patient or public contribution: Results were presented to stakeholders (physicians) to check and improve their practical applicability.
Keywords: clinicians; communication; disclosure; health care; health personnel; physician-patient relations; referral and consultation; review; uncertainty.
© 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
References
-
- Fox RC. Medical uncertainty revisited. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC, eds. The handbook of social studies in health and medicine. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 2000:409–425.
-
- Timmermans S, Angell A. Evidence‐based medicine, clinical uncertainty, and learning to doctor. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42:342‐359. - PubMed
-
- Djulbegovic B, Paul A. From efficacy to effectiveness in the face of uncertainty: indication creep and prevention creep. JAMA. 2011;305(19):2005‐2006. - PubMed
-
- Han PK, Babrow A, Hillen MA, Gulbrandsen P, Smets EM, Ofstad EH. Uncertainty in health care: Towards a more systematic program of research. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(10):1756‐1766. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources