Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;10(13):4356-4365.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3973. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Magnetic resonance imaging patterns of tumor response to chemotherapy in desmoid-type fibromatosis

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance imaging patterns of tumor response to chemotherapy in desmoid-type fibromatosis

Edoardo Zanchetta et al. Cancer Med. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to investigate changes in volume and MRI T2-weighted intensity in desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) receiving methotrexate plus vinca-alkaloids (MTX-VA) at Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan.

Methods: All cases of sporadic DF treated with MTX-VA from 1999 to 2019 were reviewed. MRIs at baseline, 6 and 12 months of chemotherapy and at treatment withdrawal were retrospectively reviewed, contouring the tumor lesion and measuring diameters, volume, and mean T2-signal intensity (normalized to muscle) changes. These parameters were also evaluated according to clinical variables.

Results: Thirty-two DF patients were identified. Best RECIST response was: 25% partial response, 69% stable disease, 6% progression. A ≥65% tumor volume reduction was observed in 38%, <65% reduction in 53%, an increase in 9%. 22% had RECIST stable disease with a ≥65% tumor volume reduction. T2-signal intensity decreased by ≥50% in 47%, <50% in 41% and increased in 12%. In patients with symptomatic improvement while on therapy and in patients maintaining symptomatic improvement during follow-up, median T2-signal intensity showed a reduction along the time points (3.0, 1.9, 1.2, 1.1; 2.9, 2.0, 1.2, 1.2, respectively); in patients without symptomatic improvement and in those clinically progressing during follow-up, a reduction was not observed. High T2-signal intensity at baseline was observed in patients showing RECIST progression during follow-up.

Conclusions: In this series, RECIST detected a lower proportion of responses as compared to volumetric and T2-signal changes. T2-signal reduction seemed to better reflect symptomatic improvement. High T2-signal intensity at baseline was related to a higher proportion of further progression.

Keywords: aggressive fibromatosis; magnetic resonance imaging; methotrexate; tumor response; vinca alkaloids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All Authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Bar plot with the best response according to the three radiological parameters on the y‐axis and the patients’ ID on the x‐axis. The red dashed lines at 0.20 and −0.30 indicate the Progressive Disease and Partial Response cut‐off of RECIST, respectively. The orange and green dashed line at −0.65 and −0.50 indicates the cut‐offs for volume and T2 intensity reduction, respectively
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Spaghetti plots reporting the trend over time of (A) T2 ratio, (B) longest diameter, and (C) volume for each considered patient, respectively. A zoom window is also reported to aid the interpretation of the volume trend. Dots and dashed gray lines indicate the patients’ values and their trend over time. The solid black lines indicate the median values at each time point
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Spaghetti plots reporting the trend over time of (A) T2 ratio, (B) longest diameter, and (C) volume for each considered patient according to the symptomatic improvement during therapy (available for 20 patients). The red and green solid lines indicate the trend of the median values in the subgroups of patients without and with clinical improvement, respectively
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Spaghetti plots reporting the trend over time of (A) T2 ratio, (B) longest diameter, and (C) volume for each considered patient according to the clinical progression during follow‐up (available for 17 patients). The red and green solid lines indicate the trend of the median values in the subgroups of patients with and without clinical further progression, respectively
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Spaghetti plots reporting the trend over time of (A) T2 ratio, (B) longest diameter, and (C) volume for each considered patient according to the retreatment during follow‐up. The red and green solid lines indicate the trend of the median values in the subgroups of patients with and without retreatment, respectively
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Spaghetti plots reporting the trend over time of (A) T2 ratio, (B) longest diameter, and (C) volume for each considered patient according to the RECIST progression during follow‐up (available for 30 patients). The red and green solid lines indicate the trend of the median values in the subgroups of patients with and without progression, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jo VY, Fletcher CDM. WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the 2013 (4th) edition. Pathology. 2014;46:95‐104. 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinha A, Tekkis PP, Neale KF, et al. Risk factors predicting intra‐abdominal desmoids in familial adenomatous polyposis: a single centre experience. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14:141‐146. 10.1007/s10151-010-0573-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonvalot S, Ternès N, Fiore M, et al. Spontaneous regression of primary abdominal wall desmoid tumors: more common than previously thought. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4096‐4102. 10.1245/s10434-013-3197-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gounder MM, Mahoney MR, Van Tine BA, et al. Sorafenib for advanced and refractory desmoid tumors. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2417‐2428. 10.1056/NEJMoa1805052 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fiore M, Rimareix F, Mariani L, et al. Desmoid‐type fibromatosis: a front‐line conservative approach to select patients for surgical treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2587‐2593. 10.1245/s10434-009-0586-2 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms