Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;5(12):1187-1195.
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Inhibitor-Associated Retinopathy

Affiliations

Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Inhibitor-Associated Retinopathy

Jasmine H Francis et al. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate clinical and morphologic characteristics of serous retinal disturbances in patients taking extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors.

Design: Single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data.

Participants: Of 61 patients receiving ERK inhibitors for treatment of metastatic cancer, this study included 40 eyes of 20 patients with evidence of retinopathy confirmed by OCT.

Methods: Clinical examination, fundus photography, and OCT were used to evaluate ERK inhibitor retinopathy. The morphologic features, distribution, and location of fluid foci were evaluated serially. Visual acuity (VA) and choroidal thickness measurements were compared at baseline, fluid accumulation, and resolution.

Main outcome measures: Characteristics of treatment-emergent choroid and retinal OCT abnormalities as compared with baseline OCT findings and the impact of toxicity on VA.

Results: Of 20 patients with retinopathy, most showed fluid foci that were bilateral (100%), multifocal in each eye (75%), and with at least 1 focus involving the fovea (95%). All subretinal fluid foci occurred between the interdigitation zone and an intact retinal pigment epithelium. No statistical difference was found in choroidal thickness at fluid accumulation and resolution compared with baseline. Forty-five percent of eyes showed evidence of concomitant intraretinal edema localized to the outer nuclear layer. At the time of fluid accumulation, 57.5% eyes showed a decline in VA (mainly by 1-2 lines from baseline). For all eyes with follow-up, the subretinal fluid and intraretinal edema were reversible and resolved without medical intervention, and best-corrected VA at fluid resolution was not statistically different from baseline. Concomitant intraretinal fluid was not associated with worsening of VA. No patient discontinued or decreased drug dose because of retinopathy.

Conclusions: This study showed that ERK inhibitors may cause subretinal fluid foci with unique clinical and morphologic characteristics. The observed foci were similar to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor-associated retinopathy and distinct from central serous chorioretinopathy. However, unlike with MEK inhibitors, an increased occurrence of concomitant intraretinal fluid without significant additive visual impact seems to occur with ERK inhibitors. In this series, ERK inhibitors did not cause irreversible loss of vision or serious eye damage; retinopathy was self-limited and did not require medical intervention.

Keywords: Central serous chorioretinopathy; ERK inhibitor; MEK inhibitor; Retina; Subretinal fluid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COI: JHF- none, DHL-none, JC-none, JJH: has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Exelexis, Eisai, QED, CytomX, Adaptimmune, Zymeworks, Imvax, and Merck, EIL- discloses editorial support from Pfizer Inc, outside the submitted work. BTL- grants from BioMedValley Discoveries, grants from National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study; grants from Genentech Roche, grants and personal fees from Guardant Health, grants and personal fees from Hengrui Therapeutics, grants from Lilly, grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from Illumina, grants from GRAIL, grants and non-financial support from MORE Health, non-financial support from Resolution Bioscience, non-financial support from Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Bolt Biotherapeutics, grants from Amgen, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Li has a patent US62/685,057 issued, and a patent US62/514,661 issued., IG- grants from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Mirati Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Basilea Therapeutica, grants from Bayer, grants from DeBioPharm, grants from Seagen, Inc, outside the submitted work, AD-grants from National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Ignyta/Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, personal fees from Takeda/Ariad/Millenium, personal fees from TP Therapeutics, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Blueprint Medicines, personal fees from Helsinn, personal fees from Beigene, personal fees from BergenBio, personal fees from Hengrui Therapeutics, personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from Tyra Biosciences, personal fees from Verastem, personal fees from MORE Health, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from 14ner/Elevation Oncology, personal fees from Remedica Ltd., personal fees from ArcherDX, personal fees from Monopteros, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from EMD Serono, personal fees from Melendi, personal fees from Repare RX, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Liberum, outside the submitted work; and Associated research paid to the institution from Pfizer, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Taiho, PharmaMar; research from Foundation Medicine; royalties from Wolters Kluwer; other support from Merck, Puma, Merus, Boehringer Ingelheim;and CME honoraria from Medscape, OncLive, PeerVoice, Physicians Education Resources, Targeted Oncology, Research to Practice, Axis,Peerview Institute, Paradigm Medical Communications, WebMD, MJH Life Sciences,Med Learning, Imedex,Answers in CME, Medscape, Clinical Care Options., AS- reports Funding to her institution for Clinical Trials: Merus Recipient, Kura Oncology Recipient, Surface Oncology Recipient, AstraZeneca Recipient, Lilly Recipient, Northern Biologics Recipient, Pfizer Recipient, Black Diamond Therapeutics Recipient, BeiGene Recipient, Relay Therapeutics Recipient, DHA-none

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Schematic diagram of 40 eyes of 20 patients showing the location, size and configuration of each fluid focus: blue = dome, green = caterpillar, red = wavy, yellow = splitting, grey = multifoil. Number represents patient number and circle designates those patients with visual symptoms. X at fovea designates the presence of intraretinal edema. Note the predominantly bilateral, multifocal involvement of the foci and relative symmetry between each eye.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
A representative case (patient 8) demonstrating fundus findings at time of fluid accumulation. Left column = right eye, right column = left eye. (A) Color fundus photograph showing placoid vitelliform lesions along the arcades and in the fovea corresponding to fluid foci. (B) These foci demonstrate hyper-autofluorescence. (C) Optical coherence tomography of macula demonstrating subretinal dome fluid with intraretinal edema in the outer nuclear layer. Note the absence of pigment epithelial detachments and hyperreflectile dots.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Visual acuity changes at fluid accumulation and resolution. A) Waterfall plot demonstrating change in lines of Snellen visual acuity lines from baseline to fluid accumulation in 40 eyes. B) Waterfall plot demonstrating change in lines of Snellen visual acuity from baseline to fluid resolution in 22 eyes. No statistically significant difference was observed between baseline and at fluid resolution. * = eyes with intraretinal edema
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Two representative cases (patient 14 on right, patient 3 on left) demonstrating the “multifoil” configuration of subretinal fluid. Note the multiple undulations of the detached neurosensory retina simulating a multifoil arch.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
A representative case (patient 15) demonstrating optical coherence tomography findings at baseline, fluid accumulation and its resolution. Left column = right eye, right column = left eye. (A) Baseline optical coherence tomography showing normal retinal, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroidal structures. Note the difficulty in fully distinguishing the interdigitation zone (IZ) from the RPE and ellipsoid zone (EZ). (B) One day following first weekly dose of ERK-inhibitor fluid foci are detected in both eyes in dome configuration, fluid between RPE and IZ (“splitting”) with intraretinal edema in outer nuclear layer (ONL). (C) One week following first weekly dose, the fluid foci and intraretinal edema are resolving in both eyes. (D) One day after fourth weekly dose, the fluid foci and intraretinal edema have recurred. The IZ is elongated and both the IZ and EZ remain distinguishable and hyperreflectile. (E) One week following fourth weekly dose, the fluid foci and intraretinal edema are resolving in both eyes. (F) Two weeks after final sixth weekly dose, the retinal layers resume their normal appearance.

Comment in

References

    1. Akinleye A, Furqan M, Mukhi N, et al. MEK and the inhibitors: from bench to bedside. J Hematol Oncol 2013;6:27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fouladi M, Stewart CF, Blaney SM, et al. A molecular biology and phase II trial of lapatinib in children with refractory CNS malignancies: a pediatric brain tumor consortium study. J Neurooncol 2013;114:173–179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner MC, Rossfeld K, Salama AKS, et al. Can binimetinib, encorafenib and masitinib be more efficacious than currently available mutation-based targeted therapies for melanoma treatment? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017;18:487–495. - PubMed
    1. Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Ascierto PA, et al. Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:435–445. - PubMed
    1. Suresh PS, Jairam RK, Chandrasekhar DV, et al. Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetics of Ulixertinib, a Novel ERK1/2 Inhibitor from Mice, Rats, and Dogs Pharmacokinetics. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2018;43:453–460. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources