Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;46(1):207-219.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02368-3. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Algorithm-Assisted Decision Making in Otoplasty

Affiliations

Algorithm-Assisted Decision Making in Otoplasty

Mattia Siliprandi et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Ear congenital deformities represent an aesthetical concern in adult patients and a social matter in children. An accurate assessment of ear defects should be made preoperatively in order to plan surgery adequately.

Materials and methods: In order to correctly assess the ear preoperatively the authors have considered four different subunits: helical and scaphal region (A), antihelical region (B), conchal region (C) and lobule region (D). Surgical planning should start from sub-unit A evaluation, ending with sub-unit D, in a concentric fashion. When sub-unit A defects have to be corrected, an anterior approach is preferred.

Discussion: A correct evaluation of ear defects prior to surgery is of dramatic importance. Sub-unit A ear defects are often disregarded, and surgical techniques for their correction are rarely considered. Correcting helical and scaphal defects requires an anterior approach, influencing the technique employed for the correction of subunits B and C defects. Sub-unit B defects should be evaluated and corrected before sub-unit C defects in order to avoid overcorrection of ear protrusion.

Conclusion: Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature for correcting ear defects. After many years of experience, we outlined a schematic flowchart that prevents from leaving areas of the ear untreated, providing the best possible result for the patient.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords: Algorithm-Assisted; Decision-making; Otoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jones ES, Gibson JAG, Dobbs TD, Whitaker IS (2020) The Psychological, Social and Educational Impact of Prominent Ears: A Systematic Review. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS 73(12):2111–2120 - DOI
    1. Rumsey N, Harcourt D (2004) Body Image and Disfigurement: Issues and Interventions. Body Image 1(1):83–97 - DOI
    1. Dieffenbach JFnd (1845) “Die Operative Chirugie.” Leipzig, Germany: Brockhaus, pp 369–73.
    1. Stenström SJ (1963) A ‘NATURAL’ TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITALLY PROMINENT EARS. Plast Reconstr Surg 32(5):509 - DOI
    1. Chongchet V (1963) A METHOD OF ANTIHELIX RECONSTRUCTION. Br J Plast Surg 16(July):268–272 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources