Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018
- PMID: 34107181
- PMCID: PMC8385648
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018
Abstract
Background: Documenting current trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control may inform public health policy and planning.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from adults with diabetes in the United States participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to assess national trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control from 1999 through 2018.
Results: Diabetes control improved from 1999 to the early 2010s among the participants but subsequently stalled and declined. Between the 2007-2010 period and the 2015-2018 period, the percentage of adult NHANES participants with diabetes in whom glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin level, <7%) was achieved declined from 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9 to 61.8) to 50.5% (95% CI, 45.8 to 55.3). After major improvements in lipid control (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, <130 mg per deciliter) in the early 2000s, minimal improvement was seen from 2007-2010 (52.3%; 95% CI, 49.2 to 55.3) to 2015-2018 (55.7%; 95% CI, 50.8 to 60.5). From 2011-2014 to 2015-2018, the percentage of participants in whom blood-pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved decreased from 74.2% (95% CI, 70.7 to 77.4) to 70.4% (95% CI, 66.7 to 73.8). The percentage of participants in whom all three targets were simultaneously achieved plateaued after 2010 and was 22.2% (95% CI, 17.9 to 27.3) in 2015-2018. The percentages of participants who used any glucose-lowering medication or any blood-pressure-lowering medication were unchanged after 2010, and the percentage who used statins plateaued after 2014. After 2010, the use of combination therapy declined in participants with uncontrolled blood pressure and plateaued for those with poor glycemic control.
Conclusions: After more than a decade of progress from 1999 to the early 2010s, glycemic and blood-pressure control declined in adult NHANES participants with diabetes, while lipid control leveled off. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Coresh reports owning stock options in
Figures



Comment in
-
Worsening of risk factor control in US diabetic patients: a call to action.Eur Heart J. 2021 Aug 31;42(33):3120-3121. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab501. Eur Heart J. 2021. PMID: 34324654 No abstract available.
-
Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults.N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 2;385(10):e30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2111366. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34469661 No abstract available.
-
Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults.N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 2;385(10):e30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2111366. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34469662 No abstract available.
References
-
- National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020. (https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-stat...).
-
- Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 371: 117–25. - PubMed
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53. - PubMed
-
- Gæde P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GVH, Parving H-H, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383–93. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical