Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.

Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018

Affiliations

Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018

Michael Fang et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: Documenting current trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control may inform public health policy and planning.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from adults with diabetes in the United States participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to assess national trends in diabetes treatment and risk-factor control from 1999 through 2018.

Results: Diabetes control improved from 1999 to the early 2010s among the participants but subsequently stalled and declined. Between the 2007-2010 period and the 2015-2018 period, the percentage of adult NHANES participants with diabetes in whom glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin level, <7%) was achieved declined from 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9 to 61.8) to 50.5% (95% CI, 45.8 to 55.3). After major improvements in lipid control (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, <130 mg per deciliter) in the early 2000s, minimal improvement was seen from 2007-2010 (52.3%; 95% CI, 49.2 to 55.3) to 2015-2018 (55.7%; 95% CI, 50.8 to 60.5). From 2011-2014 to 2015-2018, the percentage of participants in whom blood-pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved decreased from 74.2% (95% CI, 70.7 to 77.4) to 70.4% (95% CI, 66.7 to 73.8). The percentage of participants in whom all three targets were simultaneously achieved plateaued after 2010 and was 22.2% (95% CI, 17.9 to 27.3) in 2015-2018. The percentages of participants who used any glucose-lowering medication or any blood-pressure-lowering medication were unchanged after 2010, and the percentage who used statins plateaued after 2014. After 2010, the use of combination therapy declined in participants with uncontrolled blood pressure and plateaued for those with poor glycemic control.

Conclusions: After more than a decade of progress from 1999 to the early 2010s, glycemic and blood-pressure control declined in adult NHANES participants with diabetes, while lipid control leveled off. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Coresh reports owning stock options in Healthy.io; and Dr. Selvin, receiving lecture fees from Novo Nordisk. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Prevalence of Glycemic, Blood-Pressure, and Lipid Control among Adult NHANES Participants with Diagnosed Diabetes, 1999–2002 to 2015–2018.
Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. To convert the value for non–high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.02586. NHANES denotes the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Medication Use in Adult NHANES Participants with Diabetes, 1999–2002 to 2015–2018.
Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. ACE denotes angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin-receptor blocker, DPP-4 dipeptidyl peptidase 4, GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide 1, SGLT2 sodium–glucose cotransporter 2, Sulf sulfonylurea, and TZD thiazolidinedione.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Distribution of the Number of Glucose-Lowering and Blood-Pressure–Lowering Medications Used in Adult NHANES Participants with Diagnosed Diabetes, 1999–2002 to 2015–2018.
Panel A shows the distribution of the number of glucose-lowering medications used by adults with diabetes, overall and according to status with respect to glycemic control. Panel B shows the distribution of the number of blood-pressure–lowering medications used by adults with diabetes, overall and according to status with respect to blood-pressure control.

Comment in

References

    1. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020. (https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-stat...).
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 371: 117–25. - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53. - PubMed
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998; 317: 703–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gæde P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GVH, Parving H-H, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383–93. - PubMed

MeSH terms