Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 1;41(6):588-592.
doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.6.588.

Clinical Performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test and Simulation of its Real-World Application in Korea

Affiliations

Clinical Performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test and Simulation of its Real-World Application in Korea

Jaehyeon Lee et al. Ann Lab Med. .

Abstract

The rapid antigen test (RAT) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) represents a potent diagnostic method in situations of limited molecular testing resources. However, considerable performance variance has been reported with the RAT. We evaluated the clinical performance of Standard Q COVID-19 RAT (SQ-RAT; SD Biosensor, Suwon, Korea), the first RAT approved by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. In total, 680 nasopharyngeal swabs previously tested using real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) were retested using SQ-RAT. The clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT relative to that of rRT-PCR was 28.7% for all specimens and was 81.4% for specimens with RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (RdRp) threshold cycle (Ct) values ≤23.37, which is the limit of detection of SQ-RAT. The specificity was 100%. The clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT for COVID-19 diagnosis was assessed based on the Ct distribution at diagnosis of 33,294 COVID-19 cases in Korea extracted from the laboratory surveillance system of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT for COVID-19 diagnosis in the Korean population was 41.8%. Considering the molecular testing capacity in Korea, use of the RAT for COVID-19 diagnosis appears to be limited.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease; Korea; Laboratory surveillance; Rapid antigen test; Real-time reverse-transcription PCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Distribution of RdRp Ct values of all rRT-PCR tests performed on initial upper respiratory tract specimens obtained from newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients in Korea as of December 8, 2020. *Data were collected using the PowerChek 2019 nCoV (Kogene), Allplex 2019-nCoV (Seegene), Standard M nCoV (SD Biosensor), and Real-Q 2019-nCoV (Biosewoom) tests. (B) Clinical sensitivity of SQ-RAT compared with that of rRT-PCR by Ct stratum in specimens. The Ct data were collected using Standard M nCoV. Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease; Ct, threshold cycle; LoD, limit of detection; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse-transcription PCR; SQ-RAT, Standard Q COVID-19 rapid antigen test.

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, author. Options for the use of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 in the EU/EEA and the UK. Technical Report. ECDC; Stockholm: 2020.
    1. Hong KH, Lee SW, Kim TS, Huh HJ, Lee J, Kim SY, et al. Guidelines for laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Korea. Ann Lab Med. 2020;40:351–60. doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.5.351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iglὁi Z, Velzing J, van Beek J, van de Vijver D, Aron G, Ensing R, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Roche SD Biosensor Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 in municipal health service testing site, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:1323–29. doi: 10.3201/eid2705.204688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yamayoshi S, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Koga M, Akasaka O, Nakachi I, Koh H, et al. Comparison of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19. Viruses. 2020;12:1420. doi: 10.3390/v12121420. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corman VM, Haage VC, Bleicker T, Schmidt ML, Mühlemann B, Zucho wski M, et al. Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study. Lancet Microbe. 2021 Apr 7; doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types