Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 May 8;5(5):ytab174.
doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab174. eCollection 2021 May.

Diagnosis and treatment of effusive-constrictive pericarditis: a case report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Diagnosis and treatment of effusive-constrictive pericarditis: a case report

Yousif Al-Saiegh et al. Eur Heart J Case Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Effusive-constrictive pericarditis (ECP) is a rare syndrome involving pericardial effusion and concomitant constrictive pericarditis. The hallmark is a persistently elevated right atrial pressure of >10 mmHg or reduction of less than 50% from baseline despite pericardiocentesis. Aetiologies include radiation, infection, malignancy, and autoimmune disease.

Case summary: A 71-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation, obesity, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea, managed with continuous positive airway pressure presented with acute pericarditis complicated by pericardial effusion leading to cardiac tamponade. He was diagnosed with ECP after pericardiocentesis and was managed surgically with a pericardial window.

Discussion: Early detected cases of ECP can be managed by medical therapy. Therapeutic interventions include pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiostomy, and pericardiectomy. This report describes a case of new-onset congestive heart failure secondary to ECP.

Keywords: Cardiac tamponade; Case report; Constrictive; Pericarditis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electrocardiogram on presentation: sinus rhythm, heart rate 98 beats per minute, with low voltage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transthoracic echocardiogram in parasternal long-axis view on presentation showing a large circumferential pericardial effusion with mild right ventricular diastolic collapse suggestive of early cardiac tamponade. LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; P, pericardium; PE, pleural effusion; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Right atrial pressure on first admission before pericardiocentesis with markedly elevated mean right atrial pressure of 34 mmHg (nl 0–8 mmHg). (B) Right atrial pressure after drainage of pericardial effusion and with pericardial. Persistent elevated mean right atrial pressure of 13 mmHg with a rapid y-descent (red arrow) reflecting constrictive disease. The rapid y descent indicates absence of tamponade physiology.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (A) delayed enhancement imaging in short-axis shows circumferential pericardial oedema. (B) Real-time cine imaging in long-axis demonstrates slightly enlarged atria and ventricles have a tubular configuration suggestive of pericardial constriction. (C) Real-time cine imaging in short-axis with (D) diastolic interventricular septal flattening on deep inspiration indicating increased ventricular coupling which diagnosis of pericardial constriction. IVS, interventricular septum; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; P, pericardium; PE, pleural effusion; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Transthoracic echocardiogram showing mitral valve doppler with an E/A ratio of 1.5 which indicates restrictive mitral inflow velocity. (B) Pulsed wave Doppler of the hepatic vein shows end-diastolic reversal of the blood flow with end-expiratory increment. (C) The inferior vena cava is dilated (red arrow, diameter >21 mm) and does not collapse during inspiration, suggesting an elevated right atrial pressure of 20 mmHg. (D) Tissue Doppler showing the increased medial and reduced lateral mitral annular velocity which is typical for constrictive pericarditis. The constricting pericardium limits movement of the lateral aspect of the heart, while movement is still preserved at the septum. Medial E′ velocity: 14.4 cm/s (red arrow) and lateral E′ velocity: 8.5 cm/s (blue arrow).
None

References

    1. Ntsekhe M, Shey Wiysonge C, Commerford PJ, Mayosi BM.. The prevalence and outcome of effusive constrictive pericarditis: a systematic review of the literature. Cardiovasc J Afr 2012;23:281–285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nugue O, Millaire A, Porte H, de Groote P, Guimier P, Wurtz A. et al.Pericardioscopy in the etiologic diagnosis of pericardial effusion in 141 consecutive patients. Circulation 1996;94:1635–1641. - PubMed
    1. Sagrista-Sauleda J, Angel J, Sanchez A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J.. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis. N Engl J Med 2004;350:469–475. - PubMed
    1. Reuss CS, Wilansky SM, Lester SJ, Lusk JL, Grill DE, Oh JK. et al.Using mitral ‘annulus reversus’ to diagnose constrictive pericarditis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:372–375. - PubMed
    1. Chetrit M, Xu B, Verma BR, Klein AL.. Multimodality imaging for the assessment of pericardial diseases. Curr Cardiol Rep 2019;21:41. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources