Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 1;29(4):237-243.
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000725.

Resurgence of regional flaps for head and neck reconstruction

Mingyang L Gray  1 , Virginia E Drake, Shaun C Desai
Affiliations
Review

Resurgence of regional flaps for head and neck reconstruction

Mingyang L Gray et al. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The strain on healthcare resources in light of the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many head and neck surgeons to explore reconstructive options that may decrease length of stay. Here, we review three common and versatile regional flaps used in head and neck reconstruction that are comparable alternatives to free tissue transfer.

Recent findings: Initial anatomic descriptions of the facial artery musculocutaneous (FAMM) flap, the supraclavicular artery island flap and the submental artery island flap were published decades ago. Since then, many have proposed modifications to these descriptions to improve technical ease and patient outcomes. Benefits of regional flaps include ease of harvest, comparable outcomes to free tissue microvascular flaps, shorter operative time and hospital length of stay. Drawbacks to regional flaps include limitations to size and reach, partial necrosis, wound dehiscence and surgeon experience. The integrity of the vascular pedicle is also contingent upon vessel preservation during the cancer ablation.

Summary: Although a resurgence of regional flaps began well before the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions began looking for alternatives to free flap reconstruction to conserve healthcare resources and minimize patient hospitalization time in the past year. There has been a revival of regional flaps such as the FAMM, supraclavicular and submental flaps that are valuable reconstructive options for many defects of the head and neck.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Day AT, Sher DJ, Lee RC, et al. Head and neck oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: reconsidering traditional treatment paradigms in light of new surgical and other multilevel risks. Oral Oncol 2020; 105:104684.
    1. Desai SC, Seth R. Shifting paradigms in head and neck reconstructive surgery during the COVID-19 crisis. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22:152–154.
    1. Patel RJ, Kejner A, McMullen C. Early institutional head and neck oncologic and microvascular surgery practice patterns across the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID19) pandemic. Head Neck 2020; 42:1168–1172.
    1. Ranasinghe V, Mady LJ, Kim S, et al. Major head and neck reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: the University of Pittsburgh approach. Head Neck 2020; 42:1243–1247.
    1. Pribaz J, Stephens W, Crespo L, Gifford G. A new intraoral flap: facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90:421–429.