A minimally invasive approach to pilonidal disease with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a single-center case series with long-term results
- PMID: 34110535
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02477-w
A minimally invasive approach to pilonidal disease with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT): a single-center case series with long-term results
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive techniques for treating pilonidal disease are safe and effective alternatives to conventional surgery, with improved recovery time, cosmetic results, and pain control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year surgical outcomes of a single-center case series treated with endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients treated with EPSiT, by a single surgical team, from March 2015 to December 2019, for primary or recurrent pilonidal disease. The primary outcomes were recurrence, persistence and treatment failure. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, painkiller use, time off work, satisfaction, complications, wound healing time, time to persistence or recurrence.
Results: Forty-two patients underwent 46 EPSiT procedures [34 males, 8 females, median age 25 (IQR 13.75) years] for primary (47.8%) or recurrent pilonidal disease (52.2%). All patients completed the follow-up [median 62 (IQR 43) months]. The single procedure healing rate was 76.1%. The healing rate for the first procedures plus the second EPSiT procedure (performed in 4 cases) was 83.3%. Among the 46 EPSiT procedures, we recorded six cases of persistence (13.0%) and five cases of recurrence (10.9%) The median operative time was 32.5 (IQR 18.75) minutes, the median pain score (visual analog scale) in week 1 was 2 (IQR 2), and the median time off work was 4 (IQR 2) days. Four patients (8.7%) experienced complications: serosanguineous (n = 2) or seropurulent discharge (n = 2). The satisfaction rate was 95.7%.
Conclusions: In our experience, EPSiT is safe, well accepted. and associated with a low level of postoperative pain, short hospitalization, short time off work, as well as optimal cosmetic results. Its failure rate is similar to that of excisional surgery.
Keywords: EPSiT; Endoscopic treatment; Minimally invasive surgery; Pilonidal disease; Pilonidal sinus.
© 2021. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: A prospective long-term study.J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Jun;74(6):1084-1088. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.9948. J Pak Med Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38948976
-
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs. laser-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: short-term results from a retrospective case-matched study.Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;26(4):271-277. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02568-8. Epub 2022 Jan 13. Tech Coloproctol. 2022. PMID: 35025023
-
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: A minimally invasive surgical technique.Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):458-463. doi: 10.1111/ases.12893. Epub 2020 Nov 12. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33185031
-
Minimally invasive techniques in the management of pilonidal disease.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Apr;34(4):561-568. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03260-y. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019. PMID: 30810799 Review.
-
Outcomes of Pediatric Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Systematic Review.Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Aug;34(4):294-300. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771224. Epub 2023 Jul 26. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024. PMID: 37494954
Cited by
-
Endoscopic approach to complex or recurrent pilonidal sinus: A retrospective analysis.Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1212-1218. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13980. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 36271666 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3474-3482. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14218. Epub 2023 May 22. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 37218401 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Non-operative management of pilonidal sinus disease; classification and outcome.Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3639-3647. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14242. Epub 2023 May 31. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 37259676 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: State of Art and Review of the Literature.Front Surg. 2022 Jan 4;8:812128. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.812128. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35059431 Free PMC article.
-
Five-year recurrence after endoscopic approach to pilonidal sinus disease: A multicentre experience.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Oct;27(10):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02846-7. Epub 2023 Aug 19. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37597082
References
-
- Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N (2003) Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 7(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510300001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bascom J, Bascom T (2002) Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg 137(10):1146–1150. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1146 (discussion 1151) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A, Giaccaglia V, Sileri P, Wexner SD (2018) Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(9):3754–3762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6157-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Singh H, Agrawal M, Singh NK, Kaul RK, Nabi G (2017) Pilonidal disease- review article. AIMDR. https://doi.org/10.21276/aimdr.2017.3.2.SG5 - DOI
-
- Muzi MG, Mascagni P, Buonomo O, Cianfarani A, Mosconi C, Colella M, Balla A, Petrella G, Quaresima S, Sileri P (2018) Muzi’s tension free primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease: updates on long-term results on 514 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 22(1):133–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3502-2 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources