Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;27(10):1516.e7-1516.e14.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.041. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike responses to Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines by previous infection status

Affiliations

Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike responses to Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines by previous infection status

David W Eyre et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated determinants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike IgG responses in healthcare workers (HCWs) following one or two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines.

Methods: HCWs participating in regular SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody testing were invited for serological testing prior to first and second vaccination, and 4 weeks post-vaccination if receiving a 12-week dosing interval. Quantitative post-vaccination anti-spike antibody responses were measured using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (detection threshold: ≥50 AU/mL). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of seropositivity and generalized additive models to track antibody responses over time.

Results: 3570/3610 HCWs (98.9%) were seropositive >14 days post first vaccination and prior to second vaccination: 2706/2720 (99.5%) were seropositive after the Pfizer-BioNTech and 864/890 (97.1%) following the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines. Previously infected and younger HCWs were more likely to test seropositive post first vaccination, with no evidence of differences by sex or ethnicity. All 470 HCWs tested >14 days after the second vaccination were seropositive. Quantitative antibody responses were higher after previous infection: median (IQR) >21 days post first Pfizer-BioNTech 14 604 (7644-22 291) AU/mL versus 1028 (564-1985) AU/mL without prior infection (p < 0.001). Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine recipients had lower readings post first dose than Pfizer-BioNTech recipients, with and without previous infection, 10 095 (5354-17 096) and 435 (203-962) AU/mL respectively (both p < 0.001 versus Pfizer-BioNTech). Antibody responses >21 days post second Pfizer vaccination in those not previously infected, 10 058 (6408-15 582) AU/mL, were similar to those after prior infection followed by one vaccine dose.

Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination leads to detectable anti-spike antibodies in nearly all adult HCWs. Whether differences in response impact vaccine efficacy needs further study.

Keywords: Antibody; Quantitative anti-spike antibody; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anti-spike IgG-positive results by days since first vaccination, by prior infection status and vaccine received. Tests performed after a second dose of vaccine are not included. The number of tests performed and positive and the resulting percentage is shown under each bar.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The relationship between vaccine, age and probability of testing anti-spike IgG seropositive >14 days post first vaccination. Model predictions are shown using reference categories for sex and ethnicity (white, female, respectively) and in those without prior evidence of infection.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Modelled quantitative anti-spike IgG responses following first vaccination by vaccine and previous infection status. Panels A and B show responses in previously infected healthcare workers (HCWs) and panels C and D HCWs without evidence of previous infection. Panels A and C show data for those receiving Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine and panels B and D Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine. Model predictions are shown at three example ages: 30, 45, and 60 years. The shaded ribbon shows the 95% confidence interval. Values are plotted from 7 days prior to vaccination to illustrate baseline values (models are fitted using data from 28 days prior to vaccination onwards).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Modelled quantitative anti-spike IgG titres following second Pfizer–BioNTech vaccination by previous infection status. Panel A shows those who were previous infected (including those previously infected at baseline or testing PCR-positive between vaccines) and panel B those who had no evidence of previous infection. Model predictions are shown at three example ages: 30, 45, and 60 years. The shaded ribbon shows the 95% confidence interval. Data were included in each model from 7 days before the second vaccination to allow pre-vaccination levels to be fitted correctly.

References

    1. Folegatti P.M., Ewer K.J., Aley P.K., Angus B., Becker S., Belij-Rammerstorfer S. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:467–478. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wajnberg A., Amanat F., Firpo A., Altman D.R., Bailey M.J., Mansour M. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months. Science. 2020;370:1227–1230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. GeurtsvanKessel C.H., Okba N.M.A., Igloi Z., Bogers S., Embregts C.W.E., Laksono B.M. An evaluation of COVID-19 serological assays informs future diagnostics and exposure assessment. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency . 2020. MHRA guidance on coronavirus (COVID-19)https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/mhra-guidance-on-coronavirus-c...
    1. Walsh E.E., Frenck R.W., Falsey A.R., Kitchin N., Absalon J., Gurtman A. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2439–2450. - PMC - PubMed