Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 25:9:e11486.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11486. eCollection 2021.

Biotin-streptavidin-guided two-step pretargeting approach using PLGA for molecular ultrasound imaging and chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Affiliations

Biotin-streptavidin-guided two-step pretargeting approach using PLGA for molecular ultrasound imaging and chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Hang Zhou et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer seriously threatens the lives and health of women, and early diagnosis and treatment are still challenging. Pre-targeting is a promising strategy to improve the treatment efficacy of ovarian cancer and the results of ultrasound imaging.

Purpose: To explore the effects of a pre-targeting strategy using streptavidin (SA) and paclitaxel (PTX)-loaded phase-shifting poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles with perfluoro-n-pentane (PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs) on the treatment and ultrasound imaging of ovarian cancer.

Methods: PTX-PLGA/PFPs were prepared with a single emulsion (O/W) solvent evaporation method and SA was attached using carbodiimide. The encapsulation efficiency of PTX and the release characteristics were assessed with high performance liquid chromatography. The phase-change characteristics of the PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs were investigated. The anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody (Ab) was covalently attached to PTX-PLGA/PFPs via carbodiimide to create PTX-PLGA-Ab/PFPs. The targeting efficiency of the nanoparticles and the viability of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells were evaluated in each group using a microscope, flow cytometry, and cell counting kit 8 assays.

Results: THE PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs were spheres with a size of 383.0 ± 75.59 nm. The encapsulation efficiency and loading capability of the nanoparticles for PTX were 71.56 ± 6.51% and 6.57 ± 0.61%, respectively. PTX was burst-released up to 70% in 2-3 d. When irradiated at 7.5 W for 3 min, the PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs visibly enhanced the ultrasonography images (P < 0.05). At temperatures of 45°C and 60°C the nanoparticles phase-shifted into micro-bubbles and the sizes increased. The binding efficiencies of SA and Ab to the PTX-PLGA/PFPs were 97.16 ± 1.20% and 92.74 ± 5.75%, respectively. Pre-targeting resulted in a high binding efficacy and killing effect on SKOV3 cells (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The two-step pre-targeting process can significantly enhance the targeting ability of PTX-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for ovarian cancer cells and substantially improve the therapeutic efficacy. This technique provides a new method for ultrasonic imaging and precise chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Keywords: Liquid-gas Phase-shift; Molecular imaging; PLGA; Paclitaxel; Pre-targeting technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Light microscope and electron microscope images of PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs.
(A) Light microscope image. (B) Inverted fluorescence microscope image of PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs labeled with DiI showing as red fluorescence. (C) SEM image. (D) TEM image. (E) Size distributions of PTXPLGA/PFPs, PLGA/PFPs, PTX-PLGA-Ab/PFPs, and PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs. (F) The chromatography results for PTX encapsulated in nanoparticles in HPLC. (G) The release curve for PTX from PTXPLGA/PFPs in vitro. (H) Confocal laser scanning microscope images of PE labeled SA, Dil labeled PTX-PLGA-Ab/PFPs, Nanoparticles without fluorescence, and FITC labeled IgG.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flow cytometry analysis of the connection efficiency of both SA and Ab bound to PTX-PLGA/PFPs.
(A) Control; (B) SA group; (C) Control; (D) Ab group.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase shifting of PTX-PLGA-SA/PFPs.
(A) After exposure to LIFU at different power levels, the B-mode and contrast ultrasonic images of nanoparticles at 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, and 8.5 W are shown. After irradiation with LIFU at different power levels, the average echo intensities of the nanoparticles are shown. (B) B-mode; (C) CEUS mode. An asterisk (*) indicates there is a significant difference compared with the 0.1 mg/ml group (P < 0.05); a number sign (#) indicates there is no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). An ampersand (&) indicates there is a significant difference compared with the rest of the groups (P < 0.05). The average ultrasonic echo intensity (dB) of the nanoparticles after phase transformation induced by LIFU at different concentrations. (D) B-mode; (E) CEUS. “*” indicates there is a significant difference compared with the 0.1 mg/ml group (P < 0.05); “#” indicates there is no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). (F) Light microscopic images of nanoparticles before and after phase transformation caused by heating.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The schematic diagram of the two-step pre-targeting technology.
(A) The schematic diagram of the two-step pre-targeting technology. (B) Confocal laser scanning microscope images of human ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells showing the results of incubation with FITC-labeled secondary antibodies. Green, FITC. Blue, DAPI.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The survival rate of SKOV3 cells after adding nanoparticles and targeting efficacy of nanoparticles.
(A) Effects of different concentrations of PTX-PLGA/PFPs on the survival rate of SKOV3 cells determined via CCK-8 assays. (B) The average cell fluorescence intensities detected with flow cytometry. An asterisk (*) indicates there is a significant difference compared with the other groups (P < 0.05); an ampersand (&) indicates there is a significant difference compared with these two groups (P < 0.05). Laser confocal microscope images of SKOV3 cells incubated with (C) Drug-loaded pretargeting, (D) Drug-loaded and directly targeting, (E) Drug-loaded and non-targeting, and (F) Antibody blocking.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Cancer cell survival rates determined with CCK-8 assays.
An asterisk (*) indicates there is a significant difference compared with the rest of the groups (P < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfaifi MY, Shati AA, Elbehairi SEI, Fahmy UA, Alhakamy NA, Md S. Anti-tumor effect of PEG-coated PLGA nanoparticles of febuxostat on A549 non-small cell lung cancer cells. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(3):133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allavena P, Palmioli A, Avigni R, Sironi M, La Ferla B, Maeda A. PLGA based nanoparticles for the monocyte-mediated anti-tumor drug delivery system. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2020;16(2):212–223. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2020.2881. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banerjee S, Kaye SB. New strategies in the treatment of ovarian cancer: current clinical perspectives and future potential. Clinical Cancer Research. 2013;19(5):961–968. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2243. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costanzo M, Carton F, Marengo A, Berlier G, Stella B, Arpicco S, Malatesta M. Fluorescence and electron microscopy to visualize the intracellular fate of nanoparticles for drug delivery. European Journal of Histochemistry. 2016;60(2):2640. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding J, Su H, Wang F, Chu T. A pre-targeting strategy for imaging glucose metabolism using technetium-99m labelled dibenzocyclooctyne derivative. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2019;29(14):1791–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.05.012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources