Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Feb;5(2):e1464.
doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1464. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Early clinical experience

Affiliations
Observational Study

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Early clinical experience

Atsushi Hiraoka et al. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Although atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/bev) treatment has been developed for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), changes in hepatic function during therapy have yet to be reported.

Aim: This retrospective clinical study aimed to elucidate early responses to Atez/Bev.

Methods: From September 2020 to April 2021, 171 u-HCC patients undergoing Atez/Bev treatment were enrolled (BCLC stage A:B:C:D = 5:68:96:2). Of those, 75 had no prior history of systemic treatment. Relative changes in hepatic function and therapeutic response were assessed using albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), ver. 1.1, respectively.

Results: In initial imaging examination findings, objective response rates for early tumor shrinkage and disease control after 6 weeks (ORR-6W/DCR-6W) were 10.6%/79.6%. Similar response results were observed in patients with and without a past history of systemic treatment (ORR-6W/DCR-6W = 9.7%/77.8% and 12.2%/82.9%), as well as patients in whom Atez/Bev was used as post-progression treatment following lenvatinib (ORR-6W/DCR-6W = 7.7%/79.5%), for which no known effective post-progression treatment has been established. In 111 patients who underwent a 6-week observation period, ALBI score was significantly worsened at 3 weeks after introducing Atez/Bev (-2.525 ± 0.419 vs -2.323 ± 0.445, p < .001), but then recovered at 6-weeks (-2.403 ± 0.452) as compared to 3-weeks (p = .001). During the observation period, the most common adverse events were appetite loss (all grades) (12.3%), general fatigue/hypertension (all grades) (11.1%, respectively), and urine protein (all grades) (10.5%).

Conclusion: Atez/Bev might have therapeutic potential not only as first but also later-line treatment of existing molecular target agents. In addition, this drug combination may have less influence on hepatic function during the early period, as the present patients showed a good initial therapeutic response.

Keywords: albumin-bilirubin score; atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; hepatic function; lenvatinib; unrespectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Atsushi Hiraoka, MD, PhD: lecture fees; Bayer, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Otsuka.

Takashi Kumada, MD, PhD: lecture fees; Eisai.

Masatoshi Kudo, MD, PhD: Advisory role: Eiasi, Ono, MSD, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Roche. Lecture fees; Eisai, Bayer, MSD, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EA Pharma. Research funding; Gilead Sciences, Taiho, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Takeda, Otsuka, EA Pharma, Abbvie, Eisai.

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Relative changes in (A) Child‐Pugh score and (B) modified ALBI grade
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Patients who underwent observations after 6 weeks (n = 111). Relative changes in ALBI score for (A) all 111 patients (baseline, −2.525 ± 0.419; 3 weeks, −2.323 ± 0.445; 6 weeks, −2.403 ± 0.452), (B) 111 patients divided by mALBI grade, (C) 111 patients divided by therapy (Atez/Bev as first‐line vs Atez/Bev as later‐line), and (D) 100 patients divided by therapeutic response (non‐PD vs PD) after exclusion of eleven patients whose imaging evaluation was slightly delayed or missing at 6 week of blood sampling. NS, not significant

References

    1. Globocan 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-she.... Accessed March 1, 2021.
    1. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):693‐699. - PubMed
    1. Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, Kakazu T. Criteria for safe hepatic resection. Am J Surg. 1995;169(6):589‐594. - PubMed
    1. Tateishi R, Shiina S, Teratani T, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. An analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer. 2005;103(6):1201‐1209. - PubMed
    1. Takayasu K, Arii S, Ikai I, et al. Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(2):461‐469. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data