Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jul 1;321(1):H208-H213.
doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00234.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Reperfused vs. nonreperfused myocardial infarction: when to use which model

Affiliations
Editorial

Reperfused vs. nonreperfused myocardial infarction: when to use which model

Merry L Lindsey et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. .

Abstract

There is a lack of understanding in the cardiac remodeling field regarding the use of nonreperfused myocardial infarction (MI) and reperfused MI in animal models of MI. This Perspectives summarizes the consensus of the authors regarding how to select the optimum model for your experiments and is a part of ongoing efforts to establish rigor and reproducibility in cardiac physiology research.

Keywords: cardiac; cardiomyocyte; ischemia-reperfusion; myocardial infarction; rigor and reproducibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M. L. Lindsey is a Stokes-Shackleford Professor at University of Nebraska Medical Center; Z. Kassiri holds a Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Cardiovascular Matrix Remodeling and is a member of the Royal Society of Canada, College of New Scholars; and K. R. Brunt is a Translational Scientist at the New Brunswick Heart Centre. None of the other authors has any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Depending on the questions being addressed (top), ischemia-reperfusion to generate reperfused myocardial infarction (MI) or permanent occlusion to generate nonreperfused MI are the best inputs (middle) to provide particular outputs (bottom).

References

    1. Bell RM, Mocanu MM, Yellon DM. Retrograde heart perfusion: the Langendorff technique of isolated heart perfusion. J Mol Cell Cardiol 50: 940–950, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.02.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen T, Vunjak-Novakovic G. In vitro models of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Regen Eng Transl Med 4: 142–153, 2018. doi:10.1007/s40883-018-0056-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindsey ML, Bolli R, Canty JM, Du XJ, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, Gourdie RG, Holmes JW, Jones SP, Kloner RA, Lefer DJ, Liao R, Murphy E, Ping P, Przyklenk K, Recchia FA, Longacre LS, Ripplinger CM, Van Eyk JE, Heusch G. Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 314: H812–H838, 2018.doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00335.2017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muessig JM, Kaya S, Moellhoff L, Noelle J, Hidalgo Pareja L, Masyuk M, Gerdes N, Pernow J, Kelm M, Jung C. A model of blood component-heart interaction in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury using a Langendorff-based ex vivo assay. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 25: 164–173, 2020. doi:10.1177/1074248419874348. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richards DJ, Li Y, Kerr CM, Yao J, Beeson GC, Coyle RC, Chen X, Jia J, Damon B, Wilson R, Starr Hazard E, Hardiman G, Menick DR, Beeson CC, Yao H, Ye T, Mei Y. Human cardiac organoids for the modelling of myocardial infarction and drug cardiotoxicity. Nat Biomed Eng 4: 446–462, 2020. doi:10.1038/s41551-020-0539-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types