Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;22(1):53-68.
doi: 10.1007/s10754-021-09309-2. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Willingness to give amid pandemics: a contingent valuation of anticipated nongovernmental immunization programs

William F Vásquez  1 , Jennifer M Trudeau  2
Affiliations

Willingness to give amid pandemics: a contingent valuation of anticipated nongovernmental immunization programs

William F Vásquez et al. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Given that altruism is crucial in assisting impoverished households to cope with health and economic crises, it is important to improve our understanding of how preferences and motives for giving differ during a pandemic. We implemented a web-based, contingent valuation survey to estimate Americans' willingness to give for nongovernmental immunization programs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results indicate that the median person is willing to give a one-time donation of $26, or at least $13 when willingness-to-give estimates are corrected for uncertainty regarding future donations. We find that willingness to give is related to income, concern levels, vaccine usage, and sociodemographic characteristics. Our findings also shed light on purely and impurely altruistic motives underlying the willingness to fund immunization programs.

Keywords: Altruism; Contingent valuation; Pandemics; Vaccines; Willingness to give.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Willingness-to-Give Estimates (95% Confidence Intervals). Note: These estimates are based on Model 4. WTG estimates were corrected for uncertainty by recoding positive responses whose certainty levels were below 7 on a 1–10 scale as negative
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reasons for Giving Reported by Sampled Individuals. Note: Observations = 1,358
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Willingness-to-Give Estimates Using Population Means by Concern Levels. Note: These estimates are based on Model 4. WTG estimates were corrected for uncertainty by recoding positive responses whose certainty levels were below 7 on a 1–10 scale as negative
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abel M, Byker T, Carpenter J. Socially optimal mistakes? Debiasing COVID-19 mortality risk perceptions and prosocial behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2021;183:456–480. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.01.007. - DOI
    1. Almario CV, May FP, Maxwell AE, Ren W, Ponce NA, Spiegel BM. Persistent racial and ethnic disparities in flu vaccination coverage: Results from a population-based study. American Journal of Infection Control. 2016;44(9):1004–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.064. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreoni J. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy. 1989;97(6):1447–1458. doi: 10.1086/261662. - DOI
    1. Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal. 1990;100(401):464–477. doi: 10.2307/2234133. - DOI
    1. Andreoni J, Brown E, Rischall I. Charitable giving by married couples who decides and why does it matter? Journal of Human Resources. 2003;38(1):111–133. doi: 10.2307/1558758. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources