Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;37(8):565-574.
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000948.

Inches, Centimeters, and Yards: Overlooked Definition Choices Inhibit Interpretation of Morphine Equivalence

Affiliations

Inches, Centimeters, and Yards: Overlooked Definition Choices Inhibit Interpretation of Morphine Equivalence

Nabarun Dasgupta et al. Clin J Pain. .

Abstract

Objective: Morphine-standardized doses are used in clinical practice and research to account for molecular potency. Ninety milligrams of morphine equivalents (MME) per day are considered a "high dose" risk threshold in guidelines, laws, and by payers. Although ubiquitously cited, the "CDC definition" of daily MME lacks a clearly defined denominator. Our objective was to assess denominator-dependency on "high dose" classification across competing definitions.

Methods: To identify definitional variants, we reviewed literature and electronic prescribing tools, yielding 4 unique definitions. Using Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs data (July to September 2018), we conducted a population-based cohort study of 3,916,461 patients receiving outpatient opioid analgesics in California (CA) and Florida (FL). The binary outcome was whether patients were deemed "high dose" (>90 MME/d) compared across 4 definitions. We calculated I2 for heterogeneity attributable to the definition.

Results: Among 9,436,640 prescriptions, 42% overlapped, which led denominator definitions to impact daily MME values. Across definitions, average daily MME varied 3-fold (range: 17 to 52 [CA] and 23 to 65 mg [FL]). Across definitions, prevalence of "high dose" individuals ranged 5.9% to 14.2% (FL) and 3.5% to 10.3% (CA). Definitional variation alone would impact a hypothetical surveillance study trying to establish how much more "high dose" prescribing was present in FL than CA: from 39% to 84% more. Meta-analyses revealed strong heterogeneity (I2 range: 86% to 99%). In sensitivity analysis, including unit interval 90.0 to 90.9 increased "high dose" population fraction by 15%.

Discussion: While 90 MME may have cautionary mnemonic benefits, without harmonization of calculation, its utility is limited. Comparison between studies using daily MME requires explicit attention to definitional variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Supported by FDA and BJA. US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (HHSF223201810183C) funded the efforts of N.D., B.A.C., and T.C. The US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Washington, DC (2017-PM-BX-K038) funded the efforts of Y.W., J.B., and C.D. The BJA is a component of the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART Office. Funding agencies had no involvement in study design, analysis, interpretation, or decision to publish. N.D. is a part-time methods consultant to the Researched Abuse, Diversion, and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) System of Denver Health and Hospitals Authority, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado. RADARS System had no knowledge of or involvement in this analysis. N.D. has no relationship with any pharmaceutical manufacturer or distributor. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Inconsistency in identifying “high dose” patients on opioids. The proportion of patients on opioids considered “high dose” (>90 mg of morphine equivalents [MME]/day) varies by definition alone, from July to September 2018. Four definitions were identified from the literature and clinical tools. Total days supply (D1) divides the sum of MMEs by the sum of days supply, allowing the denominator to be longer than the prescribed duration. On-therapy days (D2) divides total MME by the number of calendar days. Fixed observation window (D3) uses a fixed denominator, typical 30 to 90 days in research studies. Maximum daily dose (D4) identifies the day with the highest total possible exposure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liang Y, Turner BJ. Assessing risk for drug overdose in a national cohort: role for both daily and total opioid dose? J Pain. 2015;16:318–325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foley KM. The treatment of cancer pain. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:84–95. - PubMed
    1. Eddy NB, Lee LE. The analgesic equivalence to morphine and relative side action liability of oxymorphone (14-hydroxydihydro morphinone). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1959;125:116–121. - PubMed
    1. Fudin J, Raouf M, Wegrzyn EL. Opioid dosing policy: pharmacological considerations regarding equianalgesic dosing. A White Paper from the Academy of Integrative Pain Management. American Academy of Integrative Pain Management; 2017.
    1. Dasgupta N, Kramer ED, Zalman M-A, et al. . Association between non-medical and prescriptive usage of opioids. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;82:135–142. - PubMed

Publication types