Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 1;43(1):17-22.
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000978.

Parental Opinions on Medical Decision-Making in Adolescence: A Case-Based Survey

Debbie C Stavleu  1 , J Peter de Winter  1   2 , Xandra Veenstra  3 , Karlijn J van Stralen  1 , David De Coninck  4 , Koen Matthijs  4 , Jaan Toelen  2   3
Affiliations

Parental Opinions on Medical Decision-Making in Adolescence: A Case-Based Survey

Debbie C Stavleu et al. J Dev Behav Pediatr. .

Abstract

Objective: Patient trust and consent are complex topics for health care workers in pediatrics, specifically when relating to adolescent's legal status. In the context of medical decisions, not much work has been performed to understand the opinion of parents on health care decision-making, especially on confidentiality concerning their adolescent children. The purpose of this research was to assess the parental opinions on these decisions and the influence of different perspectives.

Methods: We used a case-based methodology to assess parental opinions on fictional medical decisions. A survey was provided to parents in 2 pediatric outpatient departments in Belgium and the Netherlands. The survey contained cases regarding medical care related to confidentiality and consent about which participants gave their opinion.

Results: In total, 222 surveys were completed. Overall, most parents would allow an adolescent to make his/her own decision (58.6%-70.4%), except in the case of confidentiality on alcohol-related trauma (28.9%). The results show a significant difference in how parents responded when answering from the parental perspective or adolescents' perspective. They granted significantly more authority to the adolescent in the latter view.

Conclusion: Our study shows that parents who were confronted with cases from an adolescent perspective were significantly more likely to give the patient authority. In addition, the medical issue and context influence how the parents responded. These data provide insight into the parental opinions and could lead to more evidence-based frameworks for shared medical decision-making of adolescents and their parents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Dore RA, Stone ER, Buchanan CM. A social values analysis of parental decision making [published correction appears in J Psychol. 2017;151:507]. J Psychol. 2014;148:477–504.
    1. Convention on the Rights of the Child. UN Commission on Human Rights (46th Session: 1990: Geneva); 1990.
    1. Mårtenson EK, Fägerskiöld AM. A review of children's decision-making competence in health care. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:3131–3141.
    1. Cheng TL, Savageau JA, Sattler AL, et al. Confidentiality in health care: a survey of knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes among high school students. JAMA. 1993;269:1404–1407.
    1. Thrall JS, McCloskey L, Ettner SL, et al. Confidentiality and adolescents' use of providers for health information and for pelvic examinations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:885–892.

LinkOut - more resources